SCOOPS - Seminars and Colloquia on Ökonomie, Politics, and Society
The Seminars and Colloquia on Ökonomie, Politics and Society (SCOOPS) is a MaxPo lunch-seminar series, which is usually held monthly on a Monday during the academic year. Most SCOOPS presenters are visiting scholars at MaxPo, with the seminar taking place during their stay.
Past SCOOPS Seminars
-
MaxPo seminar
Monday, October 10, 2022 | 15:00−16:30
The Density Paradox: How Rising Geographic Inequality Is Reshaping American DemocracyJacob S. Hacker, Yale University, Department of Political Science
Discussant: Jan Rovny, CEE/LIEPP, Sciences Po
The Density Paradox: How Rising Geographic Inequality Is Reshaping American Democracy
Rising geographic inequality and increasing place-based party polarization are reshaping American democracy. Central to this transformation is what my coauthor Paul Pierson and I call the “Density Paradox.” In the urban-oriented knowledge economy, density is very good for productivity and growth, which is why dense metro agglomerations are pulling away from non-metro areas across the postindustrial world. However, in territorial electoral systems—of which the United States is a particularly extreme case—density is very bad for representation. In the American framework, the Republican Party benefits greatly from its dispersed non-metro electorate, while Democrats struggle to translate their metro-based electoral majorities into governing power, despite the outsized economic importance of the places they represent. In this talk, I will examine how the Density Paradox is reshaping America’s two-party system. In particular, I will examine how the parties have had to refashion their appeals to build geographically proximate majorities that include both the prosperous and the economically struggling. As Paul and I have argued, the density paradox is fueling the Republican Party’s turn toward a particular U.S. form of right-wing populism. Less examined — and hence my major focus — is its effect on the Democratic Party. As geography has gradually replaced income as the driver of party identification, how have Democratic leaders responded? Have they followed the GOP in shifting from economic to cultural appeals, as suggested by Piketty’s critique of “Brahmin left parties”? Drawing on a range of evidence, we find that the party’s move in this direction has been limited to date. Interest cleavages within the party’s new metro-based coalition are indeed acute. Yet Democrats have managed them less by shifting to cultural issues than by carefully curating their economic agenda in order to minimize intra-coalitional conflict. The parties’ asymmetric responses reflect not only the different ways they are affected by the Density Paradox, but also the different character of their organized coalitions, as well as key features of the U.S. case that have limited the trade-offs for the Democratic Party of advancing broad (and costly) economic programs.Jacob S. Hacker is Stanley Resor Professor of Political Science at Yale University. A regular media commentator and policy adviser, he is the author or co-author of five books, numerous journal articles, and a wide range of popular writings on American politics and public policy. His most recent book, written with Paul Pierson, is American Amnesia: How the War on Government Led Us to Forget What Made America Prosper — a New York Times Book Review Editor’s Choice and a best business book of 2016 according to the management magazine Strategy + Business. Previously, the two wrote the New York Times bestseller Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class. Professor Hacker is known for his research and writings regarding health policy, especially his development of the so-called public option. He is also a member of the OECD’s High-Level Expert Group on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. He was recently elected to the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.
opener-
MaxPo seminar with Sciences Po Law School
Wednesday, September 21, 2022 | 13:00−14:30
Keeping the Wrong Secrets: The Rise of Private DataOona Hathaway, Yale Law School
Discussant: Beatriz Botero Arcila, Sciences Po, Law School
Keeping the Wrong Secrets: The Rise of Private Data
The current US national security system was designed to protect twentieth-century secrets. At the time the system was created, most important national security information was in the government’s hands. It made sense to design a system devoted almost entirely to keeping spies from obtaining that information and preventing insiders from disclosing it. Today, however, government information has been eclipsed by private information. We are living in a moment when private capacity to collect, aggregate, and analyze data is eclipsing the capacity of governments. Clearview AI claims that it is on track to collect 100 billion photos — enough to ensure “almost everyone in the world will be identifiable” — in its database within a year. Meanwhile there is an estimated $12 billion market centered on the location data on mobile phones. Six companies claim that they have more than a billion devices in their data. And these companies are far from alone. There are 4,000 data brokerage companies in the world, 87 percent of them located in the United States. Advocates of regulating the collection of private data have long focused on the civil liberty and privacy concerns raised by data collection. But the national security costs are only just beginning to come into view—troves of personal data, much of it readily available, that can be exploited by foreign powers. Each piece of information, taken on its own, is relatively unimportant. But when placed together, they can be used to construct a mosaic that gives foreign adversaries unprecedented insight into the personal lives of most Americans—as well as those whose data flows through the US. It also offers unprecedented opportunities to manipulate public opinion in ways that deeply undermine democratic governance.Oona A. Hathaway is the Gerard C. and Bernice Latrobe Smith Professor of International Law at Yale Law School, Professor of International Law and Area Studies at the Yale University MacMillan Center, Professor of the Yale University Department of Political Science, and Director of the Yale Law School Center for Global Legal Challenges. She has been a member of the Advisory Committee on International Law for the Legal Adviser at the United States Department of State since 2005. In 2014–15, she took leave to serve as Special Counsel to the General Counsel at the US Department of Defense, where she was awarded the Office of the Secretary of Defense Award for Excellence. She is the Director of the annual Yale Cyber Leadership Forum. She has published more than 30 law review articles and The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World (with Scott Shapiro, 2017).
opener-
Joint seminar with CEE
Monday, June 20, 2022 | 13:00−14:30
The Specter of State CapitalismIlias Alami, Uppsala University
Discussant: Ulrike Lepont, Sciences Po, CEE
The Specter of State Capitalism
The talk draws upon a series of papers recently published on state capitalism, and a work-in-progress book-length manuscript co-authored with Adam D. Dixon. The book contributes to the development of state capitalism as a reflexively critical project focusing on the morphology of present-day capitalism, and particularly on the changing role of the state. It aims to bring analytical clarity to state capitalism studies by offering a rigorous definition of its object of investigation, and by demonstrating how the category state capitalism can be productively construed as a means of problematising the current aggregate expansion of the state’s role as promoter, supervisor and owner of capital across the world economy. Noting some of the geographical shortcomings of the field, we outline an alternative research agenda "uneven and combined state capitalist development" which aims at spatialising the study of state capitalism and revitalising systemic explanations of the phenomenon. Rather than the negation of an abstract model of free-market capitalism, or the rise of a nationally scaled variant of capitalism, we posit contemporary state capitalism as a global process of restructuring of the capitalist state (including in its liberal form) underpinned by secular transformations in the materiality of surplus-value production, such as the consolidation of new international divisions of labour driven by automation and labour-saving technologies. The political mediation of these transformations results in the combined expansion of state-capital hybrids and of muscular forms of statism, which develop in inter-referential and cumulative forms across territory, producing further state capitalist modalities. This is a particularly potent dynamic in contemporary state capitalism, and its tendency to develop in a spiral that both shapes and is shaped by world capitalist development.Ilias Alami is Marie Skłodowska-Curie Fellow in the Department of Social and Economic Geography at Uppsala University. Before that, Ilias worked at Maastricht University and the University of Manchester. He also held visiting positions at the Getulio Vargas Foundation in São Paulo and the University of Johannesburg. His research and teaching interests are in the areas of global political economy, money and finance, state capitalism, North-South relations, theories of the state, and the articulations between race/class/coloniality. He has published in a range of journals including New Political Economy, Review of African Political Economy, Review of Radical Political Economics, Geoforum, Development and Change, Human Geography, Competition and Change, Political Geography, Science and Society, Antipode, Geopolitics, Environment and Planning A, Contemporary Politics, and Economic Geography. He is the author of Money Power and Financial Capital in Emerging Markets (Routledge, 2019), which was shortlisted for the British International Studies Association 2020 best book in international political economy award
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, May 16, 2022 | 13:00−14:30
Coping with Instability in the EU Regulatory State: How to Steer the Green Transition?Sandra Eckert, Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies/Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main
Discussant: Matthias Thiemann, Sciences Po, CEE
Coping with Instability in the EU Regulatory State: How to Steer the Green Transition?
While the European Union (EU) has faced a context of polycrisis and rising politicisation over the past two decades, the EU regulatory state has appeared remarkably resilient to change. In view of such stability, the amount of regulatory activity that has been proposed and introduced with the EU Green Deal agenda is surprising. The Green Deal agenda aims to transform the EU into a global leader in the competitive race to successfully steer the Green Transition, and could contribute to the increase of the EU’s regulatory power which has been labelled the “Brussels effect”. One tangible example is the Green Taxonomy which European policymakers promoted as the world’s first “green list” for sustainable investment. The talk will revisit these recent changes and present a research agenda entitled “Beyond European Regulation and Green Goals” (BERGG).Sandra Eckert Sandra Eckert has been appointed Full University Professor of the Chair in Comparative Politics at the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), starting her position in the academic year 2022–2023. She currently holds a three-year Marie Skłodowska-Curie COFUND Fellowship (October 2019–October 2022) to conduct research as an Associate Professor at the Aarhus Institute of Advanced Studies (AIAS) in Denmark. During her stay in Aarhus Sandra is on leave from Goethe University where she has been Assistant Professor (Juniorprofessorin) of Politics in the European Multilevel System since October 2014. Sandra previously taught at universities in Berlin, Darmstadt, Freiburg, Mannheim, and Osnabrück, and was a guest professor at SciencesPo Lyon. In her research, Sandra studies issues related to European integration, comparative public policy and international political economy.
opener-
Joint seminar with CSO
Friday, June 3, 2022 | 10:00−12:00
The Second Demographic Transition and the Growth of Consumer DebtMaude Pugliese, Institut national de la recherche scientifique (INRS), Montréal
Discussant: Jeanne Lazarus, CSO/Sciences Po
The Second Demographic Transition and the Growth of Consumer Debt
Over the past few decades, household debt has grown, and savings have dwindled in several European and American countries. Multiple studies have explored the sources of those phenomena and identified economic and political transformations – such as declining interest rates, the erosion of welfare states, and worsening labor conditions – as key factors. This presentation will introduce an ongoing research project aimed at exploring the role of changes in family dynamics observed in several countries (that are often referred to as “the second demographic transition”) in fuelling growing debt and declining savings. Those family transformations include rising union instability, increased re-partnering, blended and stepfamilies, and falling marriage and fertility rates. I develop the hypothesis that those changes have reduced financial support among family members and that they have thereby helped to curb saving capacities and increase demand for formal credit. I explore that hypothesis by using multiple sources of micro and macro data on savings, debt, family structure, and financial support between kin members from several American and European countries covering the 1970-2019 period.Maude Pugliese is Assistant Professor of Population Studies at Institut national de la recherche scientifique (University of Québec) and the director of Observatoire des réalités familiales du Québec. Her research explores economic relations within family networks, the experiences of families in financial markets (using credit and saving products), and how those realities are shaped by class and gender or may fuel inequalities along those dimensions. Her past projects have studied how credit cards replace or enable kin-based financial support depending on economic and family conditions as well as how asset ownership is distributed within unions, with a focus on impacts for gender wealth disparities. Her current projects analyze 1) the role of family change (including lower marriage rates, increased union instability) in explaining rising household debt and 2) the institutionalization of homeownership as the primary wealth building vehicle among North American middle-class families.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, April 11, 2022 | 13:00−14:30
The New State Capitalism and the City of LondonMatthew Eagleton-Pierce, SOAS University of London
Discussant: Sukriti Issar, OSC/Sciences Po
Location: Room K.008, 1 place Saint-Thomas d'Aquin, 75007 Paris
***There will also be a Zoom option to enable a hybrid seminar***
Please register to attendThe heterogenous literature on the so-called ‘new state capitalism’ has provoked considerable academic and popular interest in recent years, but also critique regarding how to analytically bolster the concept and improve empirical understanding. As the largest exporter of financial services in the world, the City plays a crucial yet controversial role in the reproduction of money. Understanding the institutional remaking of this global financial hub has been a preoccupation of scholars within political economy and geography. Among prominent enquiries, authors have examined the City’s transnational role in financial capitalism and its domestic influence on the British economy, often in tension with manufacturing industry. In particular, theorists have pointed to a ‘core institutional nexus’ in rulemaking and elite social ties between private financial companies, the Bank of England, and the Treasury. However, one major deficiency in this literature concerns how it accounts for the role of sub-state institutions in the configuration of financial power. Remarkably, we know comparatively little about the main municipal authority with significant capacity to shape financial governance: the City of London Corporation. The Corporation is a strange hybrid: ancient, yet modern; public, yet private; domestic, yet international; visible, yet secret. As a local governing body, it conducts all the ordinary work of a public authority. But the Corporation also has many peculiar features which distinguish it from other public institutions, including vigorous support of financial services through planning law, lobbying, and other promotional efforts.
In his lecture, Mathew Eagleton-Pierce argues that the new state capitalism framework offers a vehicle for dissecting how the Corporation operates in the service of global finance. Three themes are examined. First, he explores the role of the Corporation in planning and ‘placemaking’ urban design within its jurisdiction, but also how it makes extraterritorial claims of authority in London, the UK, and elsewhere. A particular spotlight is on how the organisation evolved from a strongly English, male, elite social milieu, rooted around heritage concerns for the build environment, to one that is more international, socially diverse, and keen to meet the precise commercial demands of finance. Second, he tackles the difficult question of periodisation raised by debates on the new state capitalism, suggesting that the organisation resists neat temporal divisions. He claims that the Corporation justifies itself via multiple temporalities: from ancient liberties and ceremonies to recasting itself as a modern outfit collaborating with state and private entities. Third, he discusses the limits of the Corporation’s power, particularly in light of the radical project of Brexit and the right-wing, populist reshifting of the Conversative Party which has challenged the Corporation and the position of the City in international capitalism. In sum, the paper reveals how a powerful municipal agency works within the financial system, in the process problematising how we understand the diverse forms of the new state capitalism.Matthew Eagleton-Pierce is Senior Lecturer in International Political Economy at SOAS University of London. All his research has been preoccupied with understanding the forms of power in capitalism, with a particular interest around the nexus between material and symbolic power. Empirical work which investigates these larger tendencies is focused on three areas of global political economy: (1) trade (WTO; NGOs and trade policy); (2) finance (City of London institutional politics); and (3) ideology (neoliberalism, the politics of managerialism). His disciplinary location is within international political economy and international political sociology. He is the author of Symbolic Power in the World Trade Organization (Oxford, 2013) and Neoliberalism: The Key Concepts (Routledge, 2016).
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, March 14, 2022 | 13:00−14:30
Same as It Ever Was? Culture, Literature, and Institutional ChangeCathie Jo Martin, Boston University
Discussant: Agnès van Zanten, Sciences Po, OSC
Education system development in Britain and Denmark is rife with paradox. Eighteenth-century Denmark was a poor, backward, rural country with serfs on the periphery of Europe; yet in 1814, it became the first nation in the world (apart from Prussia) to establish a mass, public education system. In sharp contrast, rich industrial Britain developed public primary education only in 1870, although church societies founded earlier private schools for middle-class and some poor children. Late-developing Denmark with its agricultural economy established strong, publicly-funded vocational training programs at the secondary level; whereas, Britain – the leader of the industrial revolution – created a unitary secondary education system that did little to cultivate technical skills. The British unitary, humanistic secondary schools received broad support from leftist intellectuals who feared that a two-tiered, class-based schooling would disadvantage the working class. Yet over the course of the twentieth-century, Denmark with its two-tiered (and initially class-based) education system nevertheless achieved much higher levels of equality than Britain.
I argue that cultural assumptions provide context for these long-term institutional change processes in Britain and Denmark, as each country’s new reforms resonated with familiar cultural assumptions about society, class, cooperation and the state. Cultural assumptions provide context for the ideas, interests and institutional norms driving institutional change. Literature constitutes an important mechanism for the reproduction of cultural values in processes of political, institutional change in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. Authors and their literary works provide context to the drivers of institutional change in two ways, having to do with the nation-specific structure of cultural tropes in literature and the agency of authors in political struggle.
Thus, I suggest a new way of thinking about mechanisms for continuity within processes of institutional change. The transmission of literary tropes through the cultural constraint provides a somewhat autonomous channel for institutional continuities that is separate from policy legacies. Because literary symbols and narratives are recursive and repeating, they have bearing on the creation and alteration of new institutions by successive generations of policymakers. This approach offers a measure of cultural influence that is independent from the cultural element within institutions.Cathie Jo Martin is Professor of Political Science at Boston University. Her current work explores the cultural origins of diverse education systems and the impacts of these systems on the social inclusion and low-skill youth. Martin’s last book, The Political Construction of Business Interests: Coordination, Growth and Equality (co-authored with Duane Swank, Cambridge University Press 2012) won the David Greenstone book prize from the Politics and History section of APSA. The book investigates the origins of coordinated capitalism and the circumstances under which employers endorse social policies promoting economic productivity and social solidarity. She is also author of Stuck in Neutral: Business and the Politics of Human Capital Investment Policy (Princeton University Press, 2000), Shifting the Burden: the Struggle over Growth and Corporate Taxation (University of Chicago Press, 1991) and the co-edited (with Jane Mansbridge) Political Negotiation (Brookings 2015).
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, February 14, 2022 | 13:00−14:30
Embedded Liberalism versus Economic Nationalism: Explaining Trust in Political Leaders during Economic ShocksArlo Poletti, University of Trento
Discussant: Jan Rovny, Sciences Po, CEE/LIEPP
Western political parties have provided two broad sets of answers to the concerns of individuals exposed to globalization-induced economic shocks. On the one hand, mainstream parties have traditionally embraced the embedded liberalism paradigm: promoting redistribution via higher taxation as a means for shielding individuals from the negative consequences of market opening. On the other hand, populist parties have recently advocated for the economic nationalism paradigm, which proposes to cope with potential negative economic shocks induced by globalization by implementing policies of closure for both products and people, accompanied by a promise of lower taxation. In this paper, we clarify competing theories, elucidate their implications for public opinion, and describe the results of a series of survey experiments designed to evaluate which set of policies is more likely to gain the support of voters in case of negative economic shocks. Our key test involves conjoint experiments conducted in France, Germany, and Italy, surveying more than 10,000 voters. We find that politicians who implement redistribution policies and increase welfare expenditure are significantly more likely to be trusted by voters during economic shocks. The support for redistribution holds for both left and right political leaders. On the contrary, we find limited support for the economic nationalism paradigm, especially in Germany and Italy. Our micro-foundational evidence suggests a pronounced political advantage for politicians who advocate redistribution in tough times.
Arlo Poletti is an associate professor in the Department of Sociology and social research at the University of Trento.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CSO
Friday, February 11, 2022 | 10:00−12:00
Women on Corporate Boards: The Swiss Case in a Historical and Comparative PerspectiveStéphanie Ginalski, Université de Lausanne, Institute of Political Studies
Discussant: Pierre François, Sciences Po, CSO, and Dean of the School of Research
Women in Corporate Networks (20th−21st Centuries)
This presentation will introduce the project "Women in corporate networks", which gathers a group of scholars from different regions of the world to analyse women’s inclusion on corporate boards in a historical and comparative perspective. After a general introduction on the theoretical and methodological issues, I will present the empirical results for the Swiss case. The aim is to discuss the effect of the Swiss corporate network on the entry of women into the boardrooms, and the process of board feminisation across the past hundred years. The results show that during the 20th century, a dense corporate network and a strong class cohesion within the male economic elite made it very difficult for women to get on boards. The few female directors were first in family firms. Then, women active in politics and in the feminist movement entered the boardrooms of cooperatives in the distribution and retailing sector. Three main factors contributed then to the progressive increase in female directors. During the 1990’s, gender equality was seen as profitable for the firms because of the shortage of skilled labour. Increasing globalisation of the economy also contributed to weaken the cohesion of Swiss corporate elite, opening a breach for women and foreigners. Finally, the 2007-2008 financial crisis and the rise of a “transnational business feminism” contributed to make the concept of board diversity more popular. As we will see, however, this assertion of a board diversity must be tempered for several reasons.Stéphanie Ginalski is a senior lecturer at the Institute of Political Studies, University of Lausanne, and a co-founder and member of the Swiss Elites Observatory. Her main research interests focus on business elite and the transformation of capitalism during the twentieth century. She is currently co-leading a research project on local power structures and transnational connections of Swiss elites in a historical perspective (1890–2020), in which she investigates a new field of research on art societies.
opener-
MaxPo seminar
Monday, November 15, 2021| 13:00−14:30
Financiariser l’assurance | Financializing InsurancePierre François, Sciences Po, CSO, and Dean of the School of Research
Discussant: Pierre-Cyrille Hautcoeur, Paris School of Economics
After decades dominated by industrial and commercial logics, financial theory is now the dominant reasoning. This movement towards the financialization of finance is described in this book using the insurance sector as a case study. After a long century during which the power of shareholders faded behind that of managers, finance has returned to the heart of contemporary capitalism. Investors now capture most of the profit and decide on the strategic direction of large companies. And after decades dominated by industrial and commercial logics, financial theory now prevails. Banks and insurance companies have themselves been transformed even in their operations; they are pursuing objectives and deploying instruments that are profoundly different from what they were forty years ago. This movement towards the financialization of finance, described here on the basis of the textbook case of the insurance sector, can be explained by the implementation of new rules of the game by the European Union: like Basel II and III for the banking sector, the Solvency II directive has defined since 2016 a prudential framework that is entirely permeated by contemporary financial theory, designed to equip shareholders much more than to protect the insured.
Pierre François is a sociologist, CNRS research director at the Center for the Sociology of Organizations (CSO) and head of Sciences Po Doctoral School. His research focuses on the dynamics of the worlds of art – particularly contemporary poetry – and on the sociology of businesses and their leaders.
opener-
Joint seminar with CEE
Monday, October 18, 2021 | 13:00−14:30
The Color of Power: Race, Gender and Color Dynamics Among the Global EliteKevin Young, Department of Economics, University of Massachusetts Amherst
Discussant: Bruno Cousin, Sciences Po, CEE
Social scientists know a great deal about how race, gender and skin colour effect social stratification within the general population, but they lack knowledge about how these dynamics operate among elites. I examine the diversity of global elites through a network analysis of the board members of large corporations, think tanks, international organizations, private foundations, non-governmental organizations, and transnational policy planning groups – about 250 different large, globally prominent organizations in total. This project aims to provide the first descriptive picture of how global elite networks are stratified in terms of race, gender and skin colour and how these networks have been changing over time. In terms of internal dynamics, I evaluate the compensation hypothesis which states that individuals who attain prominent positions who do not share the dominant group characteristics have other compensating traits that ensure greater psychological security to incumbent elites, such as elite education or lighter skin tone.
Kevin Young is a political economist whose academic work focuses on financial regulation, transnational policy networks, and the role of private business in shaping global governance. A big focus of his work to date has involved analyzing the ways in which regulatory policy is affected by networks of elites and interest groups. Most of his published scholarship falls in line with the eclectic tradition of International Political Economy (IPE), which is a modern instantiation of the classical tradition of political economy that seeks to understand the operation of the material world under conditions of complex social stratification at the global level. Kevin Young earned his PhD from the London School of Economics in 2010. In 2011-2012 he was a Postdoctoral Fellow at the Niehaus Center for Globalization and Governance at Princeton University, and in 2012 he started his current job at the University of Massachusetts Amherst.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, June 7, 2021 | 13:00−14:30
La finance autoritaire: vers la fin du néolibéralismeMarlène Benquet, IRISSO, Dauphine Université Paris, and Théo Bourgeron, IDHES, Université Paris Nanterre
Discussant: Cornelia Woll, MaxPo, Sciences Po, Paris
La finance autoritaire: vers la fin du néolibéralisme
Donald Trump part mais ses soutiens demeurent et l’on ne peut que s’interroger face à la montée de régimes autoritaires aux États-Unis, au Royaume-Uni de Boris Johnson ou au Brésil de Jair Bolsonaro. À travers le cas du Royaume-Uni, ce livre montre que, loin d’être une insurrection électorale des classes populaires, l’ascension de ces régimes est le produit de l’action organisée d’une nouvelle forme de patronat. Les sources de financement du Brexit révèlent le poids considérable d’une partie de la finance, celle des fonds d’investissement et des hedge funds, qui voient l’Union européenne comme un obstacle à la libre circulation de leurs capitaux. Cette seconde financiarisation promeut un courant idéologique puissant mais méconnu : le libertarianisme. Niant toute forme de solidarité collective, ses partisans prônent un État minimal destiné à protéger la propriété privée, quitte à réduire les libertés civiques et démocratiques. Soucieux d’élargir leurs sources de profits, ces acteurs financiers s’attaquent dorénavant à l’environnement, qu’ils sont prêts à acheter et vendre par morceaux. Le désordre économique mondial qui ne cesse de croître est loin d’être un frein à leurs ardeurs prédatrices – et bien au contraire, ils envisagent désormais l’éventualité de conflits militaires qui se dessinent au Sud comme au Nord.Marlène Benquet is a research fellow at the CNRS in sociology, member of the Institute for Interdisciplinary Research in Social Sciences (Irisso). She works on private equity, processes of capital accumulation and circulation, ecological transitions and mass distribution.
Théo Bourgeron is a sociologist at the IDHES, University Paris Nanterre. His research interests are the sociology of money, the social history of finance, social finance, the sociology of science and technology, financialization.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − co-sponsored with École urbaine de Sciences Po and
Cities are back in town
Monday, May 3, 2021 | 13:00−14:30
Cities, Land, and Space: A History of "Urban Economics" as a FieldBéatrice Cherrier, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics (CREST)
Discussant: Philipp Brandt, Centre de sociologie des organisations (CSO), Sciences Po, Paris
Cities, Land, and Space: A History of "Urban Economics" as a Field
"Urban Economics" is an elusive object in a way that most economic fields are not. Indeed, economic, just like other mature science, is organized in fields, specialties and research programs. These are sometimes studied more as “cognitive” divisions, sometimes more as organizational and professional identities. They are sometimes tied to the identity of scientists themselves, sometimes to their research objects or questions. In economics, those cognitive and professional divisions have been quite stable over time and embedded into a consistent disciplinary structure. An intellectual reason for both the stability of fields and the mobility of economists between them is the strengthening of “core” models and methods in the postwar decades. Other scholars have pointed to the unusually strong hierarchical structure of economics and clear boundaries with other sciences.Béatrice Cherrier is a historian of economics. She is a CNRS researcher, affiliated with CREST, and an associate professor at École Polytechnique. Cherrier's overarching research agenda is to understand the perceived rise of applied economics since the 1970s. She is currently studying the question how seminars, workshops, and conferences have shaped the history of economics with Aurélien Saidi.
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, March 15, 2021 | 15:00−16:30 Paris time
Turning Inequality “Inside Out”: Accounting for Cases and Causal Complexity Via Multiple RegressionEric Schoon, Department of Sociology, Ohio State University
Discussant: Olivier Godechot, MaxPo, OSC
Turning Inequality “Inside Out”: Accounting for Cases and Causal Complexity Via Multiple Regression
Multiple forms of inequality intersect to shape important outcomes, from individuals’ life chances to rates of political participation. Explanations of these outcomes typically follow one of two models, emphasizing either net effects or the unique features of the cases that constitute those effects. This difference in focus is driven in no small part by methodology, with the former approach relying on multiple regression and the latter on case-based or comparative methods. This methodological divide poses challenges for research that aims to identify aggregate trends while accounting for substantive differences among observations, and allowing for the kinds of causal complexity associated with the intersection of multiple forms of inequality. Thus, unpacking the relationship between aggregate trends and the cases that constitute those trends stands as a critical challenge. In this talk, I discuss how a novel approach to statistical analysis, which brings cases and causal complexity to the fore by turning regression “inside out”, can account for the forms of causal complexity privileged by case-oriented methods. Using two empirical examples, I illustrate how this approach can be used to account for equifinality, multifinality, and asymmetric causality.
Eric Schoon is an assistant professor of sociology at Ohio State University. His research is motivated by intersecting theoretical, substantive, and methodological interests. His theoretical interests center on the assignment and consequences of cultural classifications. This is reflected in his research on legitimacy, which examines how legitimacy and illegitimacy are evaluated, established, and invoked, and how these classifications affect socially significant outcomes. He explores these questions in the context of contentious politics. His published research in this area combines international comparison with a particular focus on the Middle East broadly, and Turkey in particular. As a comparative historical sociologist, Eric Schoon uses a variety of methods including historical research, comparative methods, quantitative network analysis, and statistical analysis, and he is interested in multi- and mixed-methods approaches to social research. These interests also motivate research on new methodologies for comparative and relational analysis.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CSO and CEE
Friday, February 19, 2021 | 10:00−12:00
Translating Expertise across Work Contexts: US Puppeteers Move from Stage to ScreenMichel Anteby, Boston University
Discussant: Léonie Hénaut, CSO, Sciences Po
Translating Expertise across Work Contexts: US Puppeteers Move from Stage to Screen
Expertise is a key currency in today’s knowledge economy. Yet as experts increasingly move across work contexts, how expertise translates across contexts remains less understood. Here, we examine how a shift in work context — which reorders the relative attention experts pay to distinct types of audiences — redefines what it means to be an expert. Our study’s setting is an established expertise in the creative industry: puppet manipulation. Through an examination of US puppeteers’ move from stage to screen (that is, film and television), we show that, while the two settings call on mostly similar repertoires of skills, puppeteers in stage ground their claims to expertise in a dialogue with spectators and consequently view expertise as achieving believability; by contrast, puppeteers in screen invoke the need to deliver on cue when dealing with producers, directors, and coworkers and view expertise as achieving task mastery. When moving between stage and screen, puppeteers therefore prioritize the needs of certain types of audiences over others’ and gradually reshape their own views of expertise. Our findings embed the nature of expertise in experts’ ordering of types of audience to attend to and provide insights for explaining how expertise can shift and become coopted by workplaces.Michel Anteby is an Associate Professor of Organizational Behavior at Boston University's Questrom School of Business and (by courtesy) Sociology at Boston University's College of Arts and Sciences. His research looks at how individuals relate to their work, their occupations, and the organizations they belong to. He examines more specifically the practices people engage in at work that help them sustain their chosen cultures or identities. In doing so, his research contributes to a better understanding of how these cultures and identities come to be and manifest themselves. Empirical foci for these inquiries have included airport security officers, business school professors, clinical anatomists, factory craftsmen, ghostwriters, and subway drivers.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, January 25, 2021 | 16:00−17:30
Trade and Nation: How Companies and Politics Reshaped Economic ThoughtEmily Erikson, Department of Sociology, Yale University
Discussant: Claire Lemercier, Centre de sociologie des organisations (CSO)
Trade and Nation: How Companies and Politics Reshaped Economic Thought
In the seventeenth century, English economic theory suddenly lost interest in the moral status of exchange and became increasingly concerned with the economic roots of national prosperity. This book uses historical, comparative, and new computational methods to shed light on why this seismic shift occurred. All methods point to two factors: the marginal political power of English merchants coupled with the rise of the company form. The increasing influence and power of the companies amplified the arguments and controversies of the merchants, while their distance from the halls of government led them to shout those arguments out to the public. Unlike in the Dutch Republic, merchants could not directly implement trade and fiscal policy. Instead they had to persuade the Crown, Parliament, and Privy Council. As a result, they published arguments based in logical arguments, empirical fact, and the scientific method demonstrating how their preferred policies would contribute to the greater benefit of the state and commonwealth. This new moral framework of growth, prosperity, and the wealth of nations evolved over time into the roots of classical economic theory. The talk provides an institutional answer to why the science of economics developed as it did. It also provides a model for applying new methods of network analysis and topic modeling to important and enduring historical problems.Emily Erikson is Academic Director of the Fox International Fellowship and Associate Professor of Sociology at Yale University. She works on the emergence and development of global networks, organizations, and the institutions of capitalism and democracy. In her award-winning book, Between Monopoly and Free Trade: The English East India Company (PUP 2014), she shows how the autonomy of agents in the East India Company fostered informal information sharing and organizational flexibility and illuminates the processes underpinning the emergence of early multi-national firms and the structure of early modern global trade. Her forthcoming book, The End of Equity: Companies and Politics in the Development of a New Science of Economics (CUP), identifies a crucial transformation in economic thinking in the early modern era, when moral issues took a backseat to growth imperatives.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, December 7, 2020 | 12:00−13:30
Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific CapitalismFabian Muniesa, Mines ParisTech
Discussant: Vincent Lépinay, Médialab, Sciences Po
Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism
In his talk, Fabian Muniesa argues that the asset & meaning anything that can be controlled, traded, and capitalized as a revenue stream & has become the primary basis of technoscientific capitalism. An asset can be an object or an experience, a sum of money or a life form, a patent or a bodily function. A process of assetization prevails, imposing investment and return as the key rationale, and overtaking commodification and its speculative logic. Although assets can be bought and sold, the point is to get a durable economic rent from them rather than make a killing on the market. Assetization examines how assets are constructed and how a variety of things can be turned into assets, analyzing the interests, activities, skills, organizations, and relations entangled in this process. He considers the assetization of knowledge, including patents, personal data, and biomedical innovation; of infrastructure, including railways and energy; of nature, including mineral deposits, agricultural seeds, and “natural capital”; and of publics, including such public goods as higher education and “monetizable social ills.” He shows the usefulness of assetization as an analytical tool and as an element in the critique of capitalism. Muniesa's talk is based on the book he jointly edited with Kean Birch, "Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism, published with MIT Press in 2020.Fabian Muniesa is a professor at Mines ParisTech (the Ecole des Mines de Paris). Originally trained as a sociologist, he has developed expertise in fields such as science and technology studies, economic sociology, economic anthropology and organization studies. His current areas of interest and research projects include: the sociology of finance, the anthropology of capitalism, the history of experimental methods in the social sciences, the pragmatics of calculation, and the politics of innovation. He is the direction of the Observatory of Responsible Innovation and the holder of an ERC Starting Grant.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, November 9, 2020 | 11:00−12:30
The New Age of Index Capitalism: How the Rise of Passive Investment Triggered a Return of Concentrated Corporate Ownership and New Private Authority for Index ProvidersEelke Heemskerk, University of Amsterdam
Discussant: Emmanuel Lazega, Centre de sociologie des organisations (CSO)
The New Age of Index Capitalism: How the Rise of Passive Investment Triggered a Return of Concentrated Corporate Ownership and New Private Authority for Index Providers
Since the global financial crisis, a research program has emerged that analyzes the shift of assets towards index funds provided by large "passive" asset managers. Rather than actively picking stocks, index funds replicate stock market indices such as the S&P 500.The rise of passive investing has two important consequences − one well-known and another one that is much less discussed. The first is the unprecedented concentration of the passive asset management industry in the hands of what we have called the big three: BlackRock, Vanguard and State Street Global Advisors. The second is that investing in passive funds means delegating investment decisions to those companies that create these indices − usually one of the three main global and highly protifable index providers, MSCI, S&P Dow Jones Indices, and FTSE Russell, whose influence thus has increased greatly. In the words of John Authers, a senior editor at Bloomberg, “indices no longer merely measure markets. They move them.” In the new economic reality of Index Capitalism the locus of agency has shifted from investors towards index providers as they decide which companies and countries are included in key benchmark indexes. Eelke Heemskerk argues that these index providers have become powerful actors which exercise growing private authority as they steer investments through the indices they create and maintain. Rather than a purely technical exercise, constructing indices is inherently political. Which companies or countries are included into an index or excluded (i.e. receive investment in- or outflows) is based on criteria defined by index providers, thereby setting standards for corporate governance and investor access. Hence, in this new age of passive investing index providers have become critical gatekeepers that exert de facto regulatory power. Through producing widely used indexes, they frame and facilitate the creation, the standardization and the distribution of financial claims on behalf of the investment community and thus have become key counterparts to states in global finance. What is more, index providers have become gatekeepers in the process of creating international financial claims, because they determine the criteria that states, especially emerging markets, have to fulfil to qualify for index membership.Eelke Heemskerk is associate professor of political science at the University of Amsterdam (UvA). He received his PhD at the Amsterdam School for Social Science Research in 2006. Heemskerk is management consultant at The Galan Group where he works with top management teams and boards of public and private organisations on issues of corporate governance and strategy. He published on corporate governance, corporate elites, social networks, and institutional reform in the Netherlands and Europe. Some selected publications are availabe on this site. In his current research Eelke is interested big data related to networks of corporate ownership and control.He directs the ERC funded CORPNET research group. He also works on how social networks influence boardroom decision-making and behavioral corporate governance.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with OSC and PRESAGE
Friday, October 9, 2020 | 12:00−13:30
Le Genre du Capital − The Gender of CapitalCéline Bessière, Université Paris-Dauphine, and Sibylle Gollac, CRESPPA, Paris
Discussant: Hélène Périvier, OFCE, Sciences Po
Céline Bessière is a professor of sociology at Paris Dauphine University (PSL University). She studies the material, economic and legal dimensions of family, in particular through the analysis of inheritance and marital breakdown. Her research is at the crossroads of several fields: sociology of law and justice, sociology of gender and family, and economic sociology.
Sibylle Gollac is a researcher at the Centre de Recherches Sociologiques et Politiques de Paris (CRESPPA). Her work focuses on the importance of inheritance in the way class- and gender-based social relations are reproduced within the family, combining ethnographic approaches and statistical analyses. She is part of the “Ruptures” group working on how marital breakdowns are treated by the law in France and Quebec. With Céline Bessière, she has been studying the means of accumulation and circulation of the family inheritance and how they are reproduced in society. They especially examine the stakes that lie behind estimating family property in cases of inheritance and divorces, the class- and gender-based social relations that then develop within families, as well as the way legal professionals (such as notary publics, lawyers, and particularly judges) intervene in this process..
We know that capitalism in the twenty-first century is synonymous with growing inequalities between social classes. What is less known is that the inequality of wealth between men and women is also increasing, despite formally equal rights and the belief that, by entering the labor market, women would have gained their autonomy. To understand why, we have to look at what is happening in families, which accumulate and transmit economic capital in order to consolidate their social position from one generation to the next. Spouses, brothers and sisters, fathers and mothers do not occupy the same positions in family reproductive strategies, nor do they benefit from the same benefits. The fruit of twenty years of research, this book shows that capital has a genre. Céline Bessière and Sibylle Gollac investigate the calculations, the divisions and the conflicts which take place at the time of marital separations and inheritances, with the assistance of the legal professions. From isolated mothers in the Yellow Vests movement to the divorce of Jeff and MacKenzie Bezos, the transmission of small businesses to the legacy of Johnny Hallyday, the mechanisms of control and distribution of capital vary according to social class, but always lead to dispossession women. This book thus analyzes how class society is reproduced thanks to the male appropriation of capital.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS
Monday, February 3, 2020 | 10:15−12:15
Manufacturing Fear: The Construction of a Political Identity on the Korean Right, 1987-2018Myungji Yang, Department of Political Science, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa
Discussant: Caterina Froio, CEE, Sciences Po
Location: room S1 at PSIA, 28 rue des Saints-PèresThis talk tackles broad questions about why some citizens vehemently resist pro-democratic changes and what fuels right-wing mobilization in South Korea. Drawing from ethnographic observation, in-depth interviews, and archival data, Yang aims to understand how the right has constructed its political identity and mobilized social support, and how its political practices have contributed to particular political outcomes during the post-authoritarian period (1987-present). The unique geopolitical conditions with which the Korean peninsula has been faced — as the last nation still divided by the Cold War, and still technically at war — have produced exceptional ideological terrain in South Korea. The anti-communist, right-wing South Korean state, backed by the US military, formed extensive coercive apparatuses to repress any oppositional forces and internal “enemies” in the name of “national security” and “liberal democracy.” The authoritarian state and its allies — the dominant conservative ruling party, mainstream conservative media, and government-sponsored civic organizations—dominated South Korean society for more than four decades. Despite the arrival of electoral democracy in 1987 and changing geopolitical conditions, the Korean right has continued to deploy anti-communist rhetoric to condemn liberal progressive groups, accusing them of undermining the Republic of Korea. Exploring how right-wing elites and intellectuals capitalize on Cold War geopolitical contestation and glorify the national modernization projects of authoritarian regimes, this research will demonstrate how the Korean right has constructed ideological and organizational infrastructures and maintained its hegemonic position in the post-authoritarian period. My research will broaden our understanding of the challenges and difficulties associated with the persistence of right-wing authoritarian legacies after democratic transitions.
Myungji Yang is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Hawai'i, Mānoa. Her research interests include the political economy of development, class politics and social inequality, democracy and civil society, globalization, and East Asia. Her work on the urban middle class and democracy in South Korea has appeared in Sociological Inquiry, Critical Asian Studies, and Korea Observer. Her first book, From Miracle to Mirage: The Making and Unmaking of the Korean Middle Class, 1960-2015, is forthcoming from Cornell University Press.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CEE
Monday, November 25, 2019 | 12:30−2:30 p.m.
The Boardroom Dynamics of Globalization: How Politics and Expertise Shape the World PolityAlexander Kentikelenis, Bocconi University, Milan, and Leonard Seabrooke, Copenhagen Business School
Discussant: Matthias Thiemann, CEE
Globalization is underpinned by international organizations — intergovernmental, non-governmental, or private — that develop norms to diffuse around the world. In their talk, Alexander Kentikelenis and Leonard Seabrooke present an integrative model for understanding how boardroom dynamics within international organizations impact the content of global norms. They argue that these processes are determined, initially, by board members’ education and careers — both a function of the dominant norm apparatus of globalization — and, subsequently, by boardroom interactions between these individuals. They document these processes by tracing the education and career trajectories of all 727 board members between 1980 and 2009 of the Executive Board of the International Monetary Fund (i.e., state representatives), a body that decides on economic policy issues impacting the lives of billions. They find that they are homogeneous in terms of academic training, but heterogeneous in terms of professional backgrounds. They further document how the aforementioned attributes of board members impact the way they behave in the boardroom, and — by extension — organizational output. The findings reveal that global norm-making is driven by professionalization and elite socialization dynamics in apex communities, even in formal intergovernmental contexts where the primacy of state interests is commonly assumed to dominate.
Alexander Kentikelenis is a social scientist interested in political economy, international affairs, and global health and development. He is assistant professor of political economy and sociology at Bocconi University. His research focuses on the links between global processes, national responses, and local- or individual-level outcomes. His work has appeared in leading academic journals, including the American Journal of Sociology, the American Sociological Review, The Lancet, and World Development. Part of his research formed the basis of parliamentary questions in the UK House of Lords and the European Parliament.
Leonard Seabrooke is Professor of International Political Economy and Economic Sociology at the Department of Business and Politics at the Copenhagen Business School. His work is known for its interdisciplinarity – drawing on political science, economic sociology, organization studies, and management studies. Seabrooke’s current research concentrates of transnational professionals across a range of cases, from financial reform experts, to tax justice activists and private sector tax experts, to diplomatic consultants, to sustainability experts, and professionals dealing with demographic issues, among others.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − CEE general seminar
Tuesday, October 22, 2019 | 12:30−2:30 p.m.
Immigration Policy and Social Policy since the 1930sJohannes Lindvall, Department of Political Science, Lund University
Senior discussant: Jan Rovny, CEE/LIEPP, Sciences Po | Junior discussant: Tirzah Jensen, MaxPo
John Lindvall's talk is based on a joint work with Frida Boräng and Sara Kalm. The nature of the relationship between immigration controls and the welfare state is debated in the social sciences. Some scholars argue that there is a trade-off between generous social policies and openness to immigration. Other scholars argue, for a variety of reasons, that there is no contradiction between generous social policies and openness to immigration; indeed, some scholars believe that there is a positive relationship between the two. He argues that a major problem with previous empirical research on this topic is that it starts at a point in time when different welfare state models already existed, and clearly defined types of migration were already taken for granted. He analyzes the co-evolution of national immigration controls and national welfare states in a large sample of countries between 1930 and 2010. He studies legislation concerning the admission of two types of migrants: on the one hand labor migrants, on the other hand refugees and the family members of resident migrants. He then shows how the relationship between admission policies and the welfare state has developed between the inter-war period and the present day. Thus, important historical developments not only within the area of social policy, but also within the area of international migration are taken into account.
Johannes Lindvall is Professor of Political Science at Lund University. His academic work is concerned with political institutions, public policy, the role of interest organizations in political decision-making, and, more generally, the relationship between states and markets. He is currently the principal investigator of a project on policing, scholing, and public health in comparative and historical perspective (2017-2022) and member of the team behind the research program "State-Making and the Origins of Global Order in the Long Nineteenth Century and Beyond" (STANCE; 2015-2020).
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CHSP and CERI
Monday, September 30, 2019 | 12:30−2:30 p.m.
Gift Exchange: The Transnational History of a Political IdeaGrégoire Mallard, Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies, Geneva
Discussants: Florence Bernault, Centre d’histoire de Sciences Po (CHSP) and Jérôme Sgard, Centre de recherches internationales (CERI)
Since Marcel Mauss published his foundational essay The Gift in 1925, many anthropologists and specialists of international relations have seen in the exchange of gifts, debts, loans, concessions or reparations the sources of international solidarity and international law. Still, Mauss's reflections were deeply tied to the context of interwar Europe and the French colonial expansion. Their normative dimension has been profoundly questioned after the age of decolonization. A century after Mauss, we may ask: what is the relevance of his ideas on gift exchanges and international solidarity? By tracing how Mauss's theoretical and normative ideas inspired prominent thinkers and government officials in France and Algeria, from Pierre Bourdieu to Mohammed Bedjaoui, Grégoire Mallard adds a building block to our comprehension of the role that anthropology, international law, and economics have played in shaping international economic governance from the age of European colonization to the latest European debt crisis.
Grégoire Mallard is Professor in the Department of Anthropology and Sociology and co-director of the Executive Master in "International Negotiation and Policymaking" at the Graduate Institute of International and Development Studies in Geneva. He is the author of Fallout: Nuclear Diplomacy in an Age of Global Fracture (University of Chicago Press 2014) and Gift Exchange: The Transnational History of a Political Idea (Cambridge University Press 2019). He is also the co-editor of Contractual Knowledge: One Hundred Years of Legal Experimentation in Global Markets (Cambridge University Press 2016), and Global Science and National Sovereignty: Studies in Historical Sociology of Science (Routledge 2008). In 2017, he has been the recipient of an ERC starting grant (2017-2022) for his new project titled Bombs, Banks and Sanctions.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CEE
Friday, September 6, 2019 | 12:30−2:30 p.m.
Why Hasn’t High-Frequency Trading Swept the Board? Shares, Sovereign Bonds and the Politics of Market StructureDonald MacKenzie, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh
Discussant: Angelo Riva, Paris School of Economics
In today’s trading of liquid financial instruments, there are two main contending agencements (in Callon's "actor-network" sense of combinations of humans and nonhuman elements that manifest distributed agency): one agencement yokes together automated high-frequency trading (HFT) and open, anonymous electronic order books; the other is organized above all around the distinction between "dealers" and "clients." This talk, which will draw upon interviews with 316 market participants (encompassing all the main classes of highly liquid financial instrument, and both Europe and the US), will discuss differences in the relative presence of the two agencements. The talk will examine in particular the processes that have given rise to especially sharp differences between the trading of shares and of sovereign bonds, and between the trading of the latter in the US and Europe. MacKenzie will conclude that the sociological literature on trading (especially on HFT) needs expanded to encompass what can be called "the politics of market structure," and, more generally, needs to pay far greater attention to the state and its agencies; symmetrically, there is a need for a stronger focus in political economy on materiality. MacKenzie’s talk will be based on a paper written jointly with Iain Hardie, Charlotte Rommerskirchen, and Arjen van der Heide.
Donald MacKenzie is Professor of Sociology at the University of Edinburgh. His current research is on the sociology of markets, focussing on automated trading. His books include Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance (MIT Press, 1990); An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets (MIT Press, 2006; publisher's note); and Chains of Finance: How Investment Management Is Shaped (Oxford University Press, 2017), jointly written with Diane-Laure Arjaliès, Philip Grant, Iain Hardie and Ekaterina Svetlova.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Thursday, June 6, 2019 | 12:30−2:30 p.m.
Gender Inequality in Business Careers in the US and Norway: How Regulatory and Moral Logics Compete within the Liberal Economic Logic of Global CapitalismMary Blair-Loy, University of California, San Diego, and Sigtona Halrynjo, Institute for Social Research, Oslo
Discussant: Marta Dominguez Folgueras, Associate Professor of Sociology, OSC/Sciences PoMary Blair-Loy is Professor and Founding Director at the Center for Research on Gender in the Professions at the University of California, San Diego. She uses multiple methods to study gender, the economy, work, and family. Her award-winning book, Competing Devotions: Career and Family among Women Executives (HUP 2003), focused on these issues for executive women, while a new study addresses these issues among executive men.
Sigtona Halrynjo is Senior Research Fellow at the Institute for Social Research in Oslo. She studies the interface between family policy and working life, gender and career in business and academic life, gender balance in senior management and equality throughout the life course, including transitions between work and retirement. Halrynjo is also concerned with gender equality challenges in work and family life in the face of global competition, digitization and efficiency.
In their lecture, Mary Blair-Loy and Sigtona Halrynjo discuss three institutional logics defining careers and workplaces: the liberal capitalist economic logic in the US, the welfare state regulatory logic in Norway, and the moral mandate of single-minded work devotion. The market logic of liberal capitalism and the moral logic of work devotion schema coincide to push out workers who do not seem to meet intensive workplace demands and to privilege workers with a caregiving spouse. Even in the gender egalitarian welfare state of Norway, large companies compete in a globalized liberal marketplace. Professional women who take the generous statutory parental leave find themselves rendered replaceable at work, as colleagues without child rearing duties take over their roles. Further, they show that to cope with the uncertainty of future business needs, companies want to recruit “young, dynamic and tech-savvy high potentials” to top leadership. The ability to advance fast and gain exposure to challenging jobs throughout one’s 30s is seen as signaling quality and devotion. However, the ideal of “careers are built before 40” conflicts with the aim of extended work careers due to demographic changes in most market societies and the long parental leaves advocated in Nordic welfare states.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, May 13, 2019 | 12:30−2:30 p.m.
Law, Politics, and Inequality in Post-Apartheid South AfricaJulian Brown, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg
Discussant: Daniel Sabbagh, CERI/Sciences PoJulian Brown is an Associate Professor in Political Studies at the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa. His research revolves around a set of interconnected themes: the emergence of new forms of popular protest outside of institutional and organisational frameworks in South Africa; the relationship between courts, the law, and legal discourses (on the one hand) and political struggles (on the other). He is currently working on the customary courts of the segregation era, and attempting to understand the ways in which a semi-invented tradition of customary dispute resolution may have shaped the emergence of a modern social and political African identity in the small towns of the northern Free State.
By many measures, South Africa is the world’s most unequal society. It is also a site of intense protest against social and economic inequality – so much so that some scholars have dubbed it “the protest capital of the world.” These protests may bear a family resemblance to many other movements confronting inequality, such as the “occupy” gatherings, anti-austerity movements, and perhaps even the current “Gilets Jaunes” protests. The context in South Africa is different, however, because these protests use the conceptual framework provided by the entrenchment of socio-economic rights in South Africa’s post-Apartheid constitution. In his lecture, Julian Brown considers recent political challenges to the neoliberal norms of South Africa’s current state, focusing on struggles around the rights to land, housing, secure tenure, and access to employment opportunities. He argues that the use of this rights-based framework by communities of the poor and their allies in civil society has permitted activists to combine disruptive street protests with courtroom challenges to state policies. In doing so, they translate local grievances into national policy developments and programs. The consequences of this are not clear – but they may suggest new alliances and new ways of conceiving of struggles against widening inequality.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, April 15, 2019 | 12:45−2:30 p.m.
Controlling Credit: Central Banking and the Planned Economy in Postwar France, 1948–1973Eric Monnet, Banque de France and Paris School of Economics
Discussant: Nicolas Delalande, Centre d’Histoire de Sciences PoEric Monnet is Economist at the Banque de France and Associate Professor at the Paris School of Economics.
It is common wisdom that central banks in the postwar (1945–1970s) period were passive bureaucracies constrained by fixed-exchange rates and inflationist fiscal policies. This view is mostly retrospective and informed by US and UK experiences. This book tells a different story. Eric Monnet shows that the Banque de France was at the heart of the postwar financial system and economic planning, and contributed to economic growth by both stabilizing inflation and fostering direct lending to priority economic activities. Credit was institutionalized as a social and economic objective. Monetary policy and credit controls were conflated. He then broadens his analysis to other European countries and sheds light on the evolution of central banks and credit policy before the Monetary Union.
Eric Monnet's talk is based on his book "Controlling Credit: Central Banking and the Planned Economy in Postwar France, 1948-1974," Cambridge University Press 2018.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, March 18, 2019 | 12:30−2:30 p.m.
The Share Economy between Sustainability and Profit MaximizationJulia Schwanholz, University of Kassel, Germany
Discussant: Zsuzsanna VarghaJulia Schwanholz is a Visiting Professor for Comparative Politics at the University of Kassel in Germany. While on leave, she holds a lecturer position at the University of Göttingen. Her research focus includes political systems, parliaments, and the digital transformation, with an emphasis on social media and platform economies.
Technological development and the Web 2.0 have stimulated the rise of online platforms. However, there is no clear definition of the sharing economy to be found in literature. Terms such as "sharing economy," "peer economy," "collaborative economy," or "on-demand economy" are often used as synonyms, although they do not mean the same thing. Despite the wide range of business initiatives adopting sharing practices that have sprung up recently, the sharing economy literature still focuses on accommodation and mobility sectors. Based on the assumption that the goals, aims, and specific practices pursued by the variety of sharing platforms reveal a lot about their (potential) contribution to political, economic and social change, the lecture has three core objectives: First, it will discuss different definitions of the sharing economy. Second, it will give an overview of sharing platforms in a German-speaking context. Third, it aims to assess the extent to which these platforms can be related to sustainability principles or should rather be related to the goal of profit maximization.
opener-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with OSC
Friday, February 8, 2019 | 11:30 a.m.−1 p.m.
The Decline of Intergenerational Mobility in Denmark: Returns to Education, Demographic Change, and Labor Market ExperienceMartin D. Munk, Aalborg University, Denmark
Discussant: Louis-André Vallet, Sciences Po − Observatoire sociologique du changementMartin D. Munk is Professor of Sociology at the Department of Political Science, Aalborg University. His research focuses on social stratification, intergenerational mobility and reproduction, the transformation of societies and welfare states, labor markets, returns to different forms of capital, and migration. He has published in various journals including Sociology, European Economic Review, and Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research. Currently, he is collaborating with senior researchers, junior researchers and grad students at Berkeley, Wisconsin-Madison, Columbia, Harvard, and Stanford. Previously, he was a visiting doctoral fellow at School for Advanced Studies in the Social Sciences (École des hautes études en sciences sociales, EHESS) in Paris.
In his lecture, Martin Munk questions a close correlation between economic inequality and social mobility. He suggests different explanations for decreasing social mobility, like changing labor and family structures resulting in a change in social stratification. Recent research shows that intergenerational income mobility is declining in a country with a relatively high degree of income equality (Denmark), even though inequality is increasing in more recent generations. The action takes place in the middle of the income distribution implying less mobility in and out of the middle incomes. Changes are possibly due to changes in economic markets, to degree of labor market attachment, family structures (family stability of parents), and may be overall societal changes towards individualization or the downsizing of welfare schemes. Much research in sociology, political science, and economics has forgotten that economy and family are two sides of the same coin.
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, December 10, 2018 | 12:30−2:30 p.m.
Power Shift by Government Debt: How the Common Government Debt Market Has Changed the Relationships between GovernmentsJenny Preunkert, University of Oldenburg
Discussant: Benjamin Lemoine, IRISSO/Université Paris Dauphine
Jenny Preunkert is Coordinator of the Research Unit "Horizontal Europeanization" funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) and the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) and Head of the project “Europeanization of Social Inequalities” at the Department of Social Sciences at the University of Oldenburg.
Benjamin Lemoine is CNRS Research Professor at the Institut de recherche interdisciplinaire en sciences sociales (IRISSO) and the Université Paris-Dauphine. In April 2018, he received the CNRS Bronze Medal for his research work on public debt and the linkage between states and global capital markets.
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, November 12, 2018
The Personalized Economy: Governing Mass Markets by Algorithms and ConversationsZsuzsanna Vargha, ESCP Europe, Paris
Discussant: Claude Rosental, EHESS, ParisZsuzsanna Vargha is Associate Professor in the Management Control Department at ESCP Europe, Paris campus. Zsuzsanna Vargha’s research is interdisciplinary, bringing together accounting and finance, organization studies and economic sociology. Her interests have centered on questions of performance and valuation at the boundaries of organizations and markets, specializing in financial services and the digital economy. Zsuzsanna has worked on topics such as the strategic design, conduct and control of banking interactions, queue management, professional tensions in advertising, financial expectations and crisis in post-socialist economies, digital health and individual incentivization, the increasing personalization of the economy, and the digital transformation of professional services firms.
Claude Rosental is Research Professor of Sociology at the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) and member of the Centre d'étude des mouvements sociaux at the Institut Marcel Mauss (UMR CNRS-EHESS). His areas of interest include: sociology of public demonstrations; sociology of logic; science, technology, and society; sociology and cognition; social, political and cultural theory; methods.
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, October 22, 2018
Banking on Markets: The Transformation of Bank-State Ties in Europe and BeyondRachel Epstein, University of Denver
Discussant: Matthias Thiemann, CEE/Sciences PoRachel Epstein is Professor of International Political Economy and European Politics at the Josef Korbel School of International Studies at the University of Denver and Academic Co-Director of the Colorado European Union Center of Excellence. She is the author of In Pursuit of Liberalism: International Institutions in Postcommunist Europe (Johns Hopkins 2008) and Banking on Markets: The Transformation of Bank−State Ties in Europe and Beyond (Oxford 2017). She has published widely on security, finance, and international organizations. Epstein has been a co-editor at the Review of International Political Economy since 2017 and is the Program Co-Chair for the European Union Studies Association meeting, which will take place in Denver in May 2019.
Matthias Thiemann is Assistant Professor at the Centre d'études européennes et de politique comparée at Sciences Po, Paris. He is a sociologist with close affinities to political economy. On the one hand, he analyzes the attempts of financial regulators in Europe and the US to control the risk-taking behavior of agents in the financial industry, an attempt complicated by the fact that these agents gain from evading such control. On the other hand, Thiemann investigates post-crisis regulatory changes in the US, asking why certain ideas that gained prominence post-crisis are translated into policy tools, while others are eschewed by policy-makers. Methodologically, he draws on expert interviews and document analysis, but also citation network analysis and topic modeling.
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, September 17, 2018
Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to NeoliberalismStephanie L. Mudge, University of California Davis
Discussant: Jenny Andersson, MaxPo/Sciences PoStephanie L. Mudge Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of California, Davis. She is a historical, political, and economic sociologist specialized in the theoretically-driven analysis of Western politics, economies, and expertise. Her new book, Leftism Reinvented: Western Parties from Socialism to Neoliberalism (May 2018, Harvard University Press), develops a century-long comparative, historical, and biographically-sensitive analysis of the American Democrats, the German and Swedish Social Democrats, and the British Labour Party.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, June 11, 2018
Infrastructural Preparedness: Anticipating Climate Crisis in the American WestAndrew Lakoff, University of Southern California
Discussant: Olivier Borraz, Sciences Po, Centre de sociologie des organisations (CSO)Andrew Lakoff holds a joint appointment in the Departments of Sociology and Communication. He was trained as an anthropologist of science and medicine, and has conducted research in Argentina, France and the United States. His areas of interest include globalization processes, the history of the human sciences, contemporary social theory, and risk society.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, May 28, 2018
Combatting the Global Business of Forced LaborGeneviève LeBaron, Department of Politics, University of Sheffield
Discussant: Pap Ndiaye, Sciences Po, Centre d’HistoireGenevieve LeBaron is Senior Lecturer in the Department of Politics at the University of Sheffield and Co-Chair of the Yale University Modern Slavery Working Group. Her current research focuses on the global business of forced labour and the politics and effectiveness of governance initiatives to combat it. Genevieve currently holds a UK Economic and Social Research Council Future Research Leaders Grant and in 2015 was awarded the British Academy Rising Star Engagement Award by the British Academy for the Humanities and Social Sciences.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, May 14, 2018
The Regulatory Politics of American NeoliberalismBasak Kus, Wesleyan University
Discussant: Matthias Thiemann, Sciences Po, CEE
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, joint with OSC
Friday, April 13, 2018
Invisible Boundaries in Cyberspace: A Relational Approach to Understand Racial Hierarchy in the United StatesKen-Hou Lin, University of Texas at Austin
Discussant: Marie Bergström, Sciences Po, OSC, INED
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Thursday, March 15, 2018
Regulating Labor: Rethinking the Role of the State for a Neoliberal EraChris Howell, James Monroe Professor of Politics, Oberlin College and Conservatory
Discussant: Patrick Le Galès, Sciences Po, CEEChris Howell is James Monroe Professor of Politics at the Oberlin College and Conservatory. He received his PhD in Political Science from Yale University. He is the recipient of a German Marshall Research Fellowship and a National Endowment for the Humanities Collaborative Research Grant. His research is in the fields of comparative politics, comparative political economy, and industrial relations. He has published numerous articles and books on labor politics, comparative political economy, and left parties in Western Europe.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, February 12, 2018
The Double Movement of Market Logic in the Governance of Social Welfare under NeoliberalismAvishai Benish, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Discussant: Emanuele Ferragina, Sciences Po, OSC, LIEPPAvishai Benish is lecturer at the Baerwald School of Social Work and Social Welfare at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Read more about Avishai Benish here.
Emanuele Ferragina is Assistant Professor at Sciences Po. He is affiliated with the OSC and the LIEPP, since January 2015. He is also Associate Member of the Department of Social Policy and Intervention at the University of Oxford.
Read more about Emanuele Ferragina here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, January 22, 2018
Towards a Theory of Monetary Dependency: Money Creation and the Policy Space of "Peripheral" StatesKai Koddenbrock, Institute for Political Science, University of Duisburg-Essen
Discussant: Kako Nubukpo, Directeur de la Francophonie économique et numérique à l'organisation internationale de la Francophonie à ParisKai Koddenbrock is a lecturer and assistant professor in International Relations and International Political Economy at the Institute of Political Science at the University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany. He is working on money theory, dependency, and the Global South. His publications have featured in the European Journal of International Relations, Third World Quarterly and Politische Vierteljahresschrift among others. During his research stay at MaxPo, he will pursue a project on monetary dependency and the West African Franc CFA zone.
Kako Nubukpo is Directeur de la Francophonie économique et numérique à l'Organisation internationale de la Francophonie à Paris.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, November 27, 2017
Refugees Welcome, Goodbye Austerity: The European "Refugee Crisis" and the Keynesian LessonPeo Hansen, Linköping University, Sweden
Discussant: Virginie Guiraudon, Sciences Po, CEEPeo Hansen is Professor of Political Science at the Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society (REMESO), Linköping University. His research focuses on European integration, EU migration policy, political economy, citizenship and postwar European geopolitics. His most recent book is Eurafrica: The Untold History of European Integration and Colonialism (co-authored with Stefan Jonsson, Bloomsbury, 2015). In 2015 Hansen was commissioned by the OECD to write a research report on the EU's external labour migration policy (OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 185, 2016). He is currently writing a book on the EU's migration crises.
Read more about Peo Hansen here.
Virginie Guiraudon Virginie Guiradon is a CNRS research director. She is the author of Les politiques d'immigration en Europe (2000). She co-authored Controlling a New Migration World (Routledge, 2001), Immigration Politics in Europe: The Politics of Control (Taylor and Francis, 2006), Politiques publiques (Presses de Sciences Po, 2008 and 2010), The Sociology of European Union (Palgrave, 2010) and Europe's Prolonged Crisis: The Making or Unmaking of a Political Union (Palgrave, 2015).
Read more about Virginie Guiraudon here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, September 18, 2017
The Politics of ResentmentKatherine J. Cramer, Morgridge Center for Public Service, University of Wisconsin-Madison
Discussant: Florence Faucher, Sciences Po, CEEKatherine J. Cramer is Professor of Political Science and Director of the Morgridge Center for Public Service at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is also an affiliate faculty member in the Elections Research Center, the School of Journalism and Mass Communication, the LaFollette School of Public Affairs, the Institute for Research on Poverty, the Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, the Center for Nonprofits, the Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education, and the Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems. Her work focuses on the way people in the United States make sense of politics and their place in it. Her book, The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness in Wisconsin and the Rise of Scott Walker, examines rural resentment toward cities and its implications for contemporary politics (University of Chicago Press, 2016), and was much discussed after the U.S. presidential election of Trump in 2016.
Read more about Katherine J. Cramer here.
Florence Faucher is Professor of political science at Sciences Po, Centre d'études européennes (CEE). She is Associate Fellow at Nuffield College and in the Department of Politics and International Relations at the University of Oxford. Faucher’s research focuses on the ways in which forms of political activism have changed over the last thirty years in political parties and social movements. She is currently working on two major projects: the first argues in favour of bringing an anthropological imagination to political analysis; the second, developed with Laurie Boussaguet (European Univerity Institute), focuses on the symbolic dimension of public policy through the example of the French government's responses to the 2015 terrorist attacks.
Read more about Florence Faucher here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, June 12, 2017
National Liberalisms in Continental Europe: Renegotiating the Social Contract in Hard TimesMark Vail, Tulane University, New Orleans
Discussant: Colin Hay, Sciences Po, CEEMark Vail joined the Tulane faculty in 2005, after receiving his PhD from the University of California, Berkeley. His research interests focus on the comparative political economy of advanced industrial societies, with a particular focus on Western Europe, economic and social policy, and the influence of political ideas and ideologies. His first book, Recasting Welfare Captialism: Economic Adjustment in Contemporary France and Germany, was published by Temple University Press in 2010.
Read more about Mark Vail here.
Colin Hay is Professor of Political Science in the Centre d'etudes europeennes at Sciences Po, Paris. He is the author of a number of books including, most recently, Developments in British Politics 10 (Palgrave, 2017, with Richard Heffernan et al.), Civic Capitalism (Polity, 2015, with Anthony Payne), The Legacy of Thatcherism (Oxford University Press, 2014, with Stephen Farrell), and The Failure of Anglo-Liberal Capitalism (Palgrave, 2013). A new collection, The Coming Crisis will be published with Polity later this year. He is editor of the journals New Political Economy, Comparative European Politics and British Politics.
Read more about Colin Hay here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, May 22, 2017
The Outsider: Henry George and Rent Theories of Economic SurplusLinsey McGoey, University of Essex
Discussant: Jenny Andersson, Sciences Po, MaxPo/CEELinsey McGoey studied journalism at Carleton University, Ottawa, before working briefly as a news editor and freelance journalist. She moved to the UK for a MSc in Social Anthropology and a PhD in Sociology at the London School of Economics. This was followed by an ESRC postdoctoral fellowship at the School of Geography, University of Oxford, and a James Martin Fellowship at the Said Business School, Oxford. McGoey is a Research Associate of the LSE's Centre for the Analysis of Risk and Regulation (CARR), and has acted as an advisor to the World Health Organization. From 2013 to 2016, she led the ESRC seminar series, Spaces of Evidence. She is on the Editorial Advisory Boards of Economy and Society and Finance and Society.
Read more about Linsey McGoey here.
Read more about Jenny Andersson here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with CSO
Friday, April 21, 2017
Dividends of Development: Securities Markets in the History of US Capitalism, 1866–1922Mary O'Sullivan, University of Geneva
Discussant: Claire Lemercier, CSO/CNRSMary O'Sullivan is a Professor of Economic History and director of the Department of Economic History at the University of Geneva. She is interested in the comparative history of capitalism and economic development with a particular focus on enterprises, industries and financial institutions. She is the author of Dividends of Development: Fits and Starts in the History of U.S. Securities Markets, 1866-1922, (Oxford University Press, 2016); Contests for Corporate Control: Corporate Governance and Economic Performance in the United States and Germany (Oxford University Press, 2000); and co-editor of the book Corporate Governance and Sustainable Prosperity (Macmillan, 2002). Her recent articles include A Fine Failure: Relationship Lending, Moses Taylor, and the Joliet Iron & Steel Company, 1869–1888 in Business History Review (Winter 2014), which was awarded the 2014 Henrietta Larson Award for the best article in that journal, and Yankee Doodle went to London: Anglo-American Breweries & the London Securities Market, 1888-1892 in Economic History Review (August 2015). She earned her Ph.D. in business economics at Harvard University, an MBA from Harvard Business School, and a Bachelor of Commerce from University College Dublin. She is working on a new project called A Blind Spot in the History of Capitalism: The Shifting Roles of Capital.
Read more about Mary O'Sullivan here.
Claire Lemercier is a CNRS research professor of history and a member of the Center for the Sociology of Organizations. Primarily a specialist of 19th-century France, she is interested in relationships between the state, firms, laws, and the market. Using quantitative as well as qualitative methods, she is currently involved in research projects about the largest French firms and their directors and CEOs in the late 19th to early 21st centuries (with Pierre François), apprenticeship in 18th- and 19th-century France (with Clare H. Crowston and Steven L. Kaplan), and the alleged disembedding of commercial relations from the 18th to the 19th centuries (with, among others, Arnaud Bartolomei and Veronica A. Santarosa).
Read more about Claire Lemercier here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, February 20, 2017
Financial Supervision in Post-2008 Europe: A Socio-Anthropological PerspectiveDaniel Seabra Lopes, Lisbon School of Economics and Management
Discussant: Sophie Dubuisson-Quellier, Centre for the Sociology of Organizations (CSO), Sciences PoDaniel Seabra Lopes graduated in Anthropology from the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidade Nova de Lisboa in 1994. He completed his Master's Degree in Anthropology: Heritage and Identities at ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon in 1999 before defending his PhD degree in Cultural and Social Anthropology at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Universidade Nova de Lisboa in 2007. In 2008, Seabra Lopes joined the SOCIUS-ISEG Research Centre in Economic and Organizational Sociology at the University of Lisbon School of Economics and Management (ISEG-ULisboa), where he has since served as a post-doctoral research fellow focusing on sociological studies of finance and organizational ethnography. He is also assistant professor at the same Lisbon School of Economics and Management. Seabra Lopes has published seventeen articles in peer-reviewed journals, two conference proceedings, seven book chapters and one authored book. Between 1998 and 2015, he participated in four research projects. Presently, Seabra Lopes coordinates two research projects. He is a social scientist, with a focus on the fields of sociology and anthropology. Thus far, Daniel Seabra Lopes interacted with thirteen collaborators as co-authors of scientific work.
Read more about Daniel Seabra Lopes here.
Read more about Sophie Dubuisson-Quellier here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with OSC
Monday, December 12, 2016
Time, Accumulation and InequalityMike Savage, London School of Economics and Political Sciences
Mike Savage is Martin White Professor of Sociology at the London School of Economics and Political Sciences. He is also the Academic Director of the Atlantic Fellows programme at the LSE's International Inequalities Institute. His research focuses on social stratification and inequality, especially the intersectional and cultural dimensions of social inequalities. Savage is the author of many influential books: Class Analysis and Social Transformation (Open University Press, 2000), Culture, Class, Distinction (Routledge, 2009 with Tony Bennett, Elizabeth Silva, Alan Warde, Modesto Gayo-Cal, and David Wright) and Social Class in the 21st Century (Penguin Books, 2015). Savage also works on urban sociology, historical sociology, social theory, and mixed methods. He is a member of the Academy of Social Sciences and Fellow of the British Academy.
Read more about Mike Savage here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with CERI
Monday, November 28, 2016
Political Connections and Economic Outcomes: Evidence from Ukraine's Orange RevolutionJohn S. Earle, George Mason University
Discussant: Gilles Favarel-Garrigues, CNRS/CERI, Sciences PoJohn S. Earle received his undergraduate degrees from Oberlin College and Conservatory and his PhD from Stanford University. Now a Professor of Public Policy at George Mason University, he has also taught at Stanford University (Fairfax, VA), Stockholm School of Economics, University of Vienna, and Central European University. His main research interests are in labor, development, transition, and institutions, including topics such as employment policies, financial constraints, reallocation, and the effects of structural and institutional change on firms and workers. A former President of the Association for Comparative Economic Studies, Earle has published articles in leading journals such as Journal of Political Economy, Economic Journal, Academy of Management Journal, Review of Economics and Statistics, American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, Journal of Comparative Economics, Journal of Labor Economics, Labour Economics, and Economics and Politics.
Read more about John S. Earle here.
Gilles Favarel-Garrigues holds a PhD in political science from Sciences Po and joined the CERI in 2001. His doctoral dissertation dealt with the fight against economic crime in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia from 1965 till 1995. His post-doctoral works are devoted to the international mobilizations against transnational criminal threats and to criminal policy in contemporary Russia. In 2006, he received the bronze medal of the CNRS. He has been a member of the section 40 of CNRS from 2008 to 2012 and scientific secretary of this section from 2010 to 2012. He holds a "habilitation à diriger des recherches" since December 2014. He co-edits the CERI working papers series Questions de recherche/Research in question and is a member of the editorial board of Critique internationale, Cultures & Conflits and Politix.
Read more about Gilles Favarel-Garrigues here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with OSC
Monday, October 10, 2016
The Influence of Social Inequality on Life SatisfactionMartin Schröder, University of Marburg
Discussant: Carlo Barone, OSC/Sciences PoMartin Schröder holds a professorship in Economic Sociology at the University of Marburg in Germany. He did his graduate work at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies and spent one year each at Sciences Po Paris and Harvard University. His research focuses on social inequality, welfare states, varieties of capitalism, the influence of morality on economic action, and life satisfaction. In 2013, he published the monograph Integrating Varieties of Capitalism and Welfare State Research: A Unified Typology of Capitalisms (Palgrave). In 2016, he published "How Income Inequality Influences Life Satisfaction" in the European Sociological Review and "Varieties of Regulation: How to Combine Sectoral, Regional and National Levels" in Regional Studies. He has also published on welfare regimes in journals such as Social Forces and the Journal of Social Policy.
Read more about Martin Schröder here.
Carlo Barone's research interests are among others: "Social Inequalities in Education: The Role of Family Background, Gender and Ethnicity" and "Labor Market Returns to Education and the Role of Education for Social Mobility in Dynamic and Comparative Perspective".
Read more about Carlo Barone here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, September 19, 2016
The Hegemony of Growth: The OECD and the Making of the Economic Growth ParadigmMatthias Schmelzer, Konzeptwerk Neue Ökonomie and University of Zurich
Discussant: Jenny Andersson, MaxPo/CEE, Sciences PoMatthias Schmelzer works at the Konzeptwerk Neue Ökonomie in Leipzig and is associated with the Center for Social and Economic History at the University of Zurich, Switzerland. He is the author of The Hegemony of Growth: The OECD and the Making of the Economic Growth Paradigm (winner of the best dissertation prize at the World Economic History Congress 2015) and has written on twentieth century social and economic history, monetary politics, international organizations, and degrowth. His current research interests include neoliberalism, the history of critiques of economic growth, the OECD, and social-ecological transformations.
Read more about Matthias Schmelzer here.
Jenny Andersson is an economic historian and CNRS Research Professor at the Center for European Studies (CEE), Paris. She is an ERC Principal Investigator of FUTUREPOL, a Sciences Po project on the political history of the future, knowledge production and future governance in the post-war period.
Read more about Jenny Andersson here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with CSO
Friday, June 3, 2016
The Architecture of Illegal MarketsJens Beckert, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne
Discussant: Henri Bergeron, CSO, Sciences PoJens Beckert is professor of sociology and director of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in Cologne. He studied sociology and business administration at the Free University of Berlin and the New School for Social Research in New York. He received his doctorate and his habilitation in sociology from the Free University. Beckert was a visiting fellow in the sociology department of Princeton University, at the Center for European Studies of Harvard University, at the European University Institute in Florence and at Sciences Po Paris. In 2012/13 he was a resident at the Institut d'études avancées in Paris. His research focuses on the fields of economic sociology, sociology of inheritance, organization theory and social theory. His new book Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics has been recently published by Harvard University Press.
Read more about Jens Beckert here.
Henri Bergeron conducts research on healthcare policy and changes in medical practice through study of various subjects: illegal drugs, alcohol, obesity, medical research, and public healthcare. He uses methods from the fields of sociology of public action and sociology of organizations to evaluate forces at work in the creation of public healthcare policies and in changes in the healthcare field. He is particularly interested in the interconnection of knowledge, expertise, and politics. He also focuses on the role of knowledge in professional practice and its affect on the way collective opinions are formed.
Read more about Henri Bergeron here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly jointly with CEE
Monday, May 30, 2016
Political Inequality in Affluent DemocraciesLarry M. Bartels, Vanderbilt University
Discussant: Nonna Mayer, CNRS/CEE/Sciences PoLarry M. Bartels holds the May Werthan Shayne Chair of Public Policy and Social Science at Vanderbilt University. His research focuses broadly on American democracy, including public opinion, electoral politics, and public policy. He is the author (with Christopher Achen) of Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government (Princeton University Press, 2016). He is also co-edited a number of books including Mass Politics in Tough Times (Oxford University Press, 2014) with Nancy Bermeo. Bartels was educated at Yale University (B.A., M.A.) and the University of California, Berkeley (PhD). He has served as vice president of the American Political Science Association and president of its Political Methodology section. He is currently a trustee of the Russell Sage Foundation and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the American Academy of Political and Social Science, and the National Academy of Sciences.
Read more about Larry M. Bartels here.
Nonna Mayer is CNRS Research Director Emerita at Centre d’études européennes de Sciences Po. She chairs the French Political Science Association (Association française de science politique/AFSP) and coordinates the AFSP Research group on Electoral Studies: FEEL/Futur des études électorales. She is the editor of the series "Contester" at the Presses de Sciences Po. Her main research topics are political participation, electoral sociology, racism and anti-Semitism, right-wing extremism.
Read more about Nonna Mayer here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with the Centre d'histoire de Sciences Po
Monday, May 9, 2016
The New Order on the Old Continent: A History of Neoliberal Europe since the 1980sPhilipp Ther, University of Vienna
Discussant: Jenny Andersson, MaxPoPhilipp Ther is professor at the University of Vienna (since 2011, after having worked in Florence and Frankfurt), and has specialized in the contemporary history of Central and Eastern Europe. His book Die neue Ordnung auf dem alten Kontinent: Eine Geschichte des neoliberalen Europa (Suhrkamp 2014) won the Essay Prize at the Leipzig Book Fair. His other publications include Die dunkle Seite der Nationalstaaten: „Ethnische Säuberungen“ im modernen Europa (Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht 2011) and In der Mitte der Gesellschaft: Operntheater in Zentraleuropa 1815–1914 (Oldenbourg 2006).
Read more about Philipp Ther here or here (in German).
Jenny Andersson is CNRS fellow researcher at the Centre d’études européennes at Sciences Po (CEE) and co-director of the Max Planck Sciences Po Center on Coping with Instability in Market Societies (MaxPo). She holds a PhD in Economic History from Uppsala University (2003). Before joining the CNRS and Sciences Po in October 2009, she was postdoctoral fellow and visiting scholar at the European University Institute, Florence, and at the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University. She was also a research fellow of the Swedish National Scientific Council and an associated professor with the Swedish Institute for Futures Studies in Stockholm from 2007-2009.
Read more about Jenny Andersson here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with CSO
Friday, April 15, 2016
Magazines and the Making of America: Modernization, Community,
and Print Culture, 1741-1860Heather A. Haveman, University of California-Berkeley
Discussant: Julia Cagé, Département d’économie, Sciences PoHeather A. Haveman is Professor of Sociology and Business at the University of California–Berkeley. She studies how organizations, industries, and employees’ careers evolve. Her publications, which cover various periods from the 18th to the 21st century, have appeared in several major business and sociological journals. The organizations she has investigated include the thrift industry, telephone companies, hotels, hospitals, and power plants in the United States as well as large firms in China. Her book Magazines and the Making of America was just published by Princeton University Press. After getting a BA in history and an MBA in management and finance from the University of Toronto, Haveman obtained her PhD in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations from UC Berkeley. She has taught at (1990-94), Cornell (1994-99), and Columbia (1998-2007). Her current research examines wineries, the emerging marijuana market, law professors, and Chinese listed firms. When she is not moving around the country, she studies how organizations, industries, and employees’ careers evolve. Her published studies have investigated California thrifts (1872-1928 and 1960s-1990s), Iowa telephone companies (1900-1917), Manhattan hotels (1898-1990), California hospitals (1978-1991), U.S. electric power plants (1980-1992), American magazines (1741-1860), and large Chinese firms (1992-2007). These studies have appeared in the Academy of Management Journal, Administrative Science Quarterly, the American Sociological Review, the American Journal of Sociology, the Journal of Business Venturing, Management and Organization Review, Organization Science, Poetics, and Sociological Science. A book on magazines is being published by Princeton University Press in August. Her current research involves antebellum American magazines, post-Prohibition U.S. wineries, and 21st-century Chinese firms.
Read more about Heather A. Haveman here.
Julia Cagé is an Assistant Professor of Economics in the Department of Economics at Sciences Po Paris. She completed her PhD at Harvard University in 2014. Her research interests focus on political economy, economic history, international trade, industrial organization and development economics. She is particularly interested in the media, especially the question of how media competition affects the provision of information and political attitudes. She is a Member of the Commission Economique de la Nation, non partisan Council of Economic Advisors to the French Finance Minister. Her work has been published in the Journal of Globalization and Development, the Journal of International Economics, the American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, as well as in several handbook chapters. She is the author of Sauver les médias: Capitalisme, financement participatif et démocratie (Le Seuil, 2015) (English translation forthcoming: Harvard University Press, 2016).
Read more about Julia Cagé here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, February 22, 2016
The Origins of Informal Global Economic Governance:
The Emergence of the G7Orfeo Fioretos, Temple University, Philadephia
Discussant: Thomas Cayet, EHESS, Esopp Centre de recherches historiquesOrfeo Fioretos is associate professor of Political Science at Temple University in Philadelphia. He received his PhD from Columbia University, and publishes work in international and comparative political economy. Fioretos is the author of Creative Reconstructions: Multilateralism and European Varieties of Capitalism After 1950 (Cornell 2011), and articles in International Organization, Review of International Political Economy, Comparative Political Studies, Review of International Studies among others. He is co-editor of The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism (2016), and editor of International Politics and Institutions in Time (Oxford UP, forthcoming). His current projects include a book on the origins and evolution of informal global economic governance with a particular focus on the Group of 7 and similar organizations. Fioretos served as the 2012-2014 Chair of the International History and Politics Section of the American Political Science Association (APSA), and is currently member of the executive councils of APSA’s Politics and History Section and European Politics and Society Section.
Read more about Orfeo Fioretos here.
Since the defense of his PhD in history in 2005 at the European University Institute in Florence, Thomas Cayet has tried to develop an original analysis at the crossroads of social and economic history, international relations and political science. His research has progressively focused on the problem of scale in implementing modes of social and economic regulation. Without overlooking the specificity of national issues, he has tried to build a new way of assessing the historical role of international organizations and networks in domains of competence usually considered as essentially "national". Thomas Cayet is currently working at the French Ministry of Labour and is a member of the ESOPP research group (EHESS).
Read more about Thomas Cayet here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Friday, February 19, 2016
Imagining the End of CapitalismFrancesco Boldizzoni, University of Turin, University of Cambridge
Discussant: Emanuele Ferragina, University of OxfordFrancesco Boldizzoni is research professor in economic history at the University of Turin and a life member of Clare Hall, Cambridge. He has held visiting appointments at several academic institutions in Europe and the United States, including the Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales, Dartmouth College, the London School of Economics and the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies. Boldizzoni’s main interests are the history of capitalism and the history of economic ideas, concepts and ideologies. Over the past few years, he has also contributed to the philosophy of history and the study of non-European historiographies in the context of a broader reflection on the power and limits of historical explanation. Boldizzoni’s chief publications include Means and Ends: The Idea of Capital in the West, 1500–1970 (Macmillan, 2008), The Poverty of Clio: Resurrecting Economic History (Princeton University Press, 2011), On History and Policy: Time in the Age of Neoliberalism (Journal of the Philosophy of History 9, 2015) and the Routledge Handbook of Global Economic History, co-edited with Pat Hudson (Routledge, 2015). His new book, Welfare States: A History, will be published by Polity Press in 2016.
Read more about Francesco Boldizzoni here.
Emanuele Ferragina is Departmental Lecturer in Comparative Social Policy at the Department of Social Policy and Intervention at the University of Oxford, where he also completed his doctoral thesis. Prior to his PhD, Emanuele received a double BA in international politics from Science Po Bordeaux and Turin University. He is interested in the political economy of the welfare state, the individual and macro determinants of social and political participation, and the innovative use of the comparative method.
Read more about Emanuele Ferragina here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with CSO
Friday, January 29, 2016
Attention Networks in Financial MarketsDavid Stark, Columbia University, NY
Discussant: Olivier Godechot, MaxPo, OSC-CNRS, Sciences PoDavid Stark is Arthur Lehman Professor of Sociology at Columbia University, where he directs the Center on Organizational Innovation. His book, The Sense of Dissonance: Accounts of Worth in Economic Life (Princeton University Press, 2009), is an ethnographic account of how organizations and their members search for what is valuable. His recent article on cognitive diversity and network social structures Game Changer: The Topology of Creativity, appeared in the January 2015 issue of American Journal of Sociology (AJS). Stark has published widely in the field of economic sociology in the AJS (2006 and 2010) and the American Sociological Review (2012). His essay on observation theory was published in Sociologica 2/2013. Within the social studies of finance, Stark has conducted ethnographic field research with Daniel Beunza and network analysis of patterns of attention with Matteo Prato. He has also done experimental lab work on ethnic diversity and market bubbles with Sheen Levine and recently published This Place, These People: Life and Shadow on the Great Plains (Columbia University Press, 2013) with photographer Nancy Warner.
Read more about David Stark here.
Olivier Godechot is MaxPo's co-director and an economic sociologist interested in the study of labor markets, especially finance and academic labor markets, as a means to understand the development of unequal exchange relations at work and their impact on the dynamics of inequality.
Read more about Olivier Godechot here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS SeminarF
riday, December 18, 2015
Political Construction of Energy Prices: Sociology of a Liberal ReformThomas Reverdy, Grenoble Institute of Technology
Discussant: David Spector, Paris School of Economics, CNRSThomas Reverdy teaches economic sociology, the sociology of work and the sociology of organizations at Grenoble Institute of Technology. His research at PACTE – Social Science Research Laboratory – investigates the shaping of the market in the energy sector and the management of technological uncertainty within complex organizations. He has published a book about the liberalization of the French energy sector (Sciences Po Press) and articles on energy traders and purchasers. He is currently working on the interplay between economic, political and institutional actors in the processes of "valuation" of demand response services through the wholesale electricity market. He is also studying technological projects in high-risk industries, seeking to understand the links between the practice of forecasting, planning and contracting, and the need for adaptation and resilience.
Read more about Thomas Reverdy here.
David Spector is associate member of the Paris School of Economics and the CNRS.
Read more about David Spector here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly with CEE
Tuesday, October 6, 2015
Are Banks Criminogenic? Explaining the Widespread Predatory Lending and Securities Fraud in the Mortgage Securities IndustryNeil Fligstein, University of California-Berkeley
Discussant: Pierre François, Sciences Po, CSO/CNRSNeil Fligstein is the Class of 1939 Professor in the Department of Sociology at the University of California-Berkely. He is also the Director of the Center of Culture, Organization, and Politics at the Institute for Research on Labor and Employment at the University of California. He is the author of numerous papers and books including The Architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of 21st Century Capitalist Societies (Princeton, 2001), Euroclash: The European Union, European Identity, and the Future of Europe (Oxford, 2008), and A Theory of Fields (with Doug McAdam, Oxford, 2012). He has written extensively in the fields of economic sociology, organizations, political sociology, social stratification, and European economic and political integration. Neil Fligstein is most well-known for his work on the sociology of markets. His work combines elements of political economy, organizational theory, and field theory, to propose how to think about the dynamics of markets. He is currently working on studying different aspects of the 2007-2010 financial crisis. He is also engaged in a project exploring how financialization has affected household attitudes towards debt and investment.
Neil Fligstein is a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. He has been a Guggenheim Fellow, a fellow of the Center of Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences in Palo Alto, and a fellow at the Rockefeller Center in Bellagio.
Read more about Neil Fligstein here.
For the last decade, sociologist Pierre François has been using economic sociology tools to analyze the dynamics of art worlds. He is currently conducting research on contemporary poetry since the 1960s in collaboration with Sébastien Dubois. In addtion, he is also working on a historical sociology of firms and their managing directors since the beginning of the 19th century, as part of a study he is conducting with Claire Lemercier. As the co-director of the research chair PARI (Sciences Po and ENSAE), he also works on the regulation of insurance business in Europe. He is the author of Le monde de la musique ancienne (Economica), Vie et mort des institutions marchands (Armand Colin), and of papers published in the Revue française de sociologie, Sociologie de travail or Poetics.
Read more about Pierre François here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, June 15, 2015
Sociabilité mondaine et utilité professionnelle: représentations et mobilisation du capital social dans les grands cercles parisiens (French)Sébastien Chauvin, University of Amsterdam
Bruno Cousin, University of Lille 1/Centre Maurice Halbwachs (ENS/EHESS/CNRS)
Discussant: Patrick Le Galès, Sciences Po / CEESébastien Chauvin is Assistant Professor of Sociology (UD1) at the University of Amsterdam and a researcher at the Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research in the program group Political Sociology: Power Place and Difference.
Read more about Sébastien Chauvin here.
Read more about Bruno Cousin here.
Patrick Le Galès, is CNRS Research Professor of Sociology and Politics, at Sciences Po Paris, Centre d’études européennes and founding Dean of Sciences Po Urban School. He also co chairs the "Cities are back in town" research group. His research deals, with Comparative Public policy, policy instruments and the political sociology of the state; Comparison of large global metropolis and European cities; Economic sociology/political economy – the making of a market society and the sociology of Europe with a special interest for the UK.
Read more about Patrick Le Galès here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, June 1, 2015
Taming the Market in 2007: Epistemic Failure at the Federal ReserveMitchell Abolafia, State University of New York, Albany
Discussant: Eric Monnet, Banque de FranceMitchell Abolafia is Professor in the Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy, University at Albany/State University of New York. He has also taught at Sloan School of Management at MIT, Johnson School of Management at Cornell, and the School of Management, University of California at Davis. Professor Abolafia’s research interests include economic sociology, organization theory, and ethnographic methods. He is the author of Making Markets: Opportunism and Restraint on Wall Street. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1997/2001 (translated into Chinese as Hua Er Jie, China Society Press. Beijing, 1999). He has published over 30 articles in such journals as Administrative Science Quarterly, Organization Studies, Strategic Management, Administration and Society, Group and Organization Management, Sociological Forum, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, American Review of Public Administration, Ethnography, and Journal of Contemporary Ethnography. He is working on a book about the Federal Reserve’s response to the financial crisis.
Read more about Mitchell Abolafia here.
Eric Monnet is a research economist at the Bank of France and teaches economic history at the Paris School of Economics. He has held visiting and research positions at Columbia University, Rutgers University, Ghent University and has been a fellow at the think tank Bruegel. He obtained his Phd in economics from the EHESS and Paris School of Economics (awarded Gerschenkron prize 2013 by the Economic History Association). His current work focuses on the history of monetary policy and central banking in Europe from WWII to the 1980s as well as on the history of the Bretton Woods system. He was editor of the review of social sciences Tracés and he is the economics and economic history editor for La Vie des Idées. He has recently published Euro, les années critiques (with Claudia Sternberg).
Read more about Eric Monnet here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly with CSO
Friday, April 10, 2015
Network Governance: Closure, Trust, Status, and ReputationRonald S. Burt, University of Chicago
Discussant: Sean Safford, Sciences Po / CSORonald S. Burt's work describes social networks creating advantage, focusing on personal networks and the network structure of markets. He coined the famous concept of Structural Holes (1992, Harvard University Press) which redefines social capital. His last book, Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal (2010, Oxford University Press), shows the extent to which network advantage depends on the person at the center of the network. After obtaining his sociology PhD from the University of Chicago, he has been affiliated to multiple institutions, of which the University of California, Berkeley, Columbia University and INSEAD. He continues today at the University of Chicago.
Read more about Ronald S. Burt here.
Sean Safford was previously an Assistant Professor of Organizations and Strategy at the University of Chicago’s Graduate School of Business, a Lecturer at the London School of Economics and Political Science and a Visiting Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School. His research is on social, economic and technological change, particularly in mature industrial economies, as well as historical social network analysis. He was a lead researcher with the MIT Local Innovation Systems Project which examined the role of universities in economic development in the US and several countries around the world.
Read more about Sean Safford here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, March 23, 2015
From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: How European Countries Democratized Their Electoral PracticesIsabela Mares, Columbia University
Discussant: Nicolas Sauger, Sciences Po / CEEIsabela Mares is a Professor of Political Science at Columbia University in New York City. Her research has covered a wide range of topics in comparative social policy and comparative political economy, including the development of social insurance institutions, the effects of wage bargaining institutions on economic outcomes and social policy reform in developing countries.
Read more about Isabela Mares here.
Nicolas Sauger is Co-Director of the LIEPP "Evaluation of Democracy" Research Group and Associate Professor of Sciences Po since 2004. His research focuses on the analysis of the transformation of structures of political competition in France and in Europe. He has a specific interest in laboratory experimentation issues in the social sciences as well as in repeated comparative surveys
Read more about Nicolas Sauger here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, November 24, 2014
Realizing Business ValueFabian Muniesa, Centre de sociologie de l’innovation, Mines ParisTech
Discussant: Daniel Benamouzig, Sciences Po, CSO/CNRSFabian Muniesa is senior researcher at Mines ParisTech (Ecole des Mines de Paris), where he directs the Observatory for Responsible Innovation. He is the author of The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn (Routledge, 2014). Working at the interface of science and technology studies and economic sociology, he has been a long-time contributor to the social studies of finance. His current research concentrates on the anthropology of capitalization, funded by an ERC Starting Grant.
Read more about Fabian Muniesa here.
Read more about Daniel Benamouzig here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, October 13, 2014
From (Neo-)Corporatism to Governance: The Evolution and Crises of Intermediary InstitutionsPoul Fritz Kjær, Copenhagen Business School
Discussant: Cornelia Woll, Sciences Po - MaxPoPoul Fritz Kjær is professor at the Department of Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business School and principal investigator of the European Research Council project Institutional Transformation in European Political Economy – a socio-legal approach (www.itepe.eu). He is the author of the books Between Governing and Governance: On the Emergence, Function and Form of Europe’s Post-national Constellation (Oxford, 2010) and Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach (London, 2014).
Read more about Poul Fritz Kjær here.
Cornelia Woll is professor of political science at Sciences Po and co-director of MaxPo. Her research focuses on international and comparative political economy. A specialist on business-government relations, she has recently published The Power of Inaction: Bank Bailouts in Comparison (Cornell University Press, 2014). Other research includes lobbying in Europe and the United States, the transformation of business-government relations, financial regulation and trade, the Europeanization of economic policy domains and French politics
Read more about Cornelia Woll here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with the Paris School of International Affairs
Monday, September 22, 2014
Improving Cyber Security while Maintaining an Integrated World MarketPeter F. Cowhey, University of California, San Diego
Discussant: Catherine Hoeffler, Université catholique de Lille, ESPOLPeter F. Cowhey is the Dean and Qualcomm Professor of Communications and Technology Policy at the School of International Relations and Pacific Studies at UC San Diego. In 2009, he served as Senior Counselor to Ambassador Kirk in the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative where he advised on the agenda for trade policy while supervising multiple USTR offices. In the Clinton Administration he served as Senior Counselor and then Chief of the International Bureau of the Federal Communications Commission during its overhaul of its global competition policies and forging of a WTO agreement on telecommunications services. Peter F. Cowhey is former Director of the UC system's Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation and head of policy studies for the California Institute on Telecommunications and Information Technology. He serves on several policy committees on innovation and technology, amongst others as chairman of the CONNECT Innovation Institute and Vice Chair of the California Council on Science and Technology. He holds a Ph.D. in political science from the University of California, Berkeley. His newest book is Transforming Global Information and Communications Markets: The Political Economy of Change (MIT Press, 2009).
Read more about Peter F. Cowhey here.
Catherine Hoeffler is lecturer in political science at the Catholic University of Lille, at the European School of Political and Social Sciences (ESPOL). Her main research areas are comparative public policy and international political economy. She has mainly worked on the comparison of defense industrial policies in the European Union (France, Germany and the UK) as well as on the sociology of elites in the US defense and health policies. She has had the opportunity to do research or teach in French institutions (Sciences Po Paris, Sciences Po Toulouse, University of Montpellier 1) as well as abroad (Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Cologne; CERIUM, Université de Montréal).
Read more about Catherine Hoeffler here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly with CEE
Tuesday, September 9, 2014
Sterilized by the State: Eugenics, Race and the Population Scare in Twentieth Century North AmericaDesmond King, University of Oxford
Discussant: Jenny Andersson, Sciences Po, CEE/CNRS and Vitezslav Sommer, Sciences Po, CEEDesmond King is the Andrew W. Mellon Professor of American Government at the University of Oxford and a Fellow of Nuffield College Oxford since 2002. His research falls into two main areas: the politics of race in the United States and the comparative political economy of labour market policy and responses to the 2008 economic crisis. His publications include Sterilized by the State: Eugenics in North America (with Randall Hansen) (Cambridge, 2013), Still A House Divided: Race and Politics in Obama’s America (with Rogers M Smith) (Princeton, 2011) and The Unsustainable American State (with Lawrence Jacobs) (Oxford, 2009). He is presently finishing a book examining the causes of persistent material racial inequality in the United States and a project with Lawrence Jacobs about the Federal Reserve’s response to the economic crisis of 2008. He was elected a Fellow of the British Academy in 2003 and during 2013-14 he was a Straus Fellow at the NYU School of Law.
Read more about Desmond King here.
Jenny Andersson is CNRS fellow and researcher at the Centre d’études européennes at Sciences Po. She has published on the transformations on social democracy in the post war period, on the political economy of the knowledge economy and the origins of futures studies. Since 2012, Jenny Andersson is directing her ERC funded project on the political history of the future (Futurepol). She recently published Governing the future: science, policy and public participation in the construction of the long term in the Netherlands and Sweden (History and Technology, 30(1-2), 2014) (with Anne-Greet Keizer).
Read more about Jenny Andersson here.
Vitezslav Sommer is junior researcher at the Centre d’études européennes at Sciences Po. As a member of the ERC project Futurepol, he is currently working on the institutional and social background of the Czechoslovak “future studies”. His main research topics are state socialism and post-socialism and governance in socialist and post-socialist East Central Europe. He recently published The ‘Club of Politically Engaged Conformists’? The Communist Party of Czechoslovakia, Popular Opinion and the Crisis of Communism, 1956 (CWIHP Working Paper 66, March 2013) (with Kevin Mc Dermott).
Read more about Vitezslav Sommer here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, June 23, 2014
Conservative Parties and the Stability of Democracy in Times of Economic CrisisDaniel Ziblatt, Harvard University
Discussant: Jan Rovny, Sciences Po, CEE / LIEPPDaniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University, and in Spring 2014 is interim director of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is the author of Structuring the State: the Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (Princeton University Press, 2006), as well as co-editor (with G. Capoccia) of The Historical Turn in Democratization Studies (2010). He is currently completing a book under contract with Cambridge University Press that analyzes how old regime elites cope with democratic institutional changes, entitled Conservative Political Parties and the Birth of Modern Democracy in Europe, 1848-1950. Ziblatt is the director of a new historical geospatial data collection project, the Comparative History of Elections Program housed at the Institute of Quantitative Social Science at Harvard University. His work has won numerous prizes and serves on the editorial board of several prestigious journals.
Read more about Daniel Ziblatt here.
Jan Rovny is an assistant professor at Sciences Po. After studies in Canada and Belgium, He received his PhD in Political Science from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and has taught in Belgium, the United States, the Czech Republic, Germany and Sweden. His research concentrates on political competition in Europe with the aim of uncovering the ideological conflict lines in different countries. His projects address the interplay between political issue dimensionality, party strategies and voter responses. He’s also one of the principal investigators of the Chapel Hill Expert Survey on party positioning - the most comprehensive survey assessing ideological placements of political parties in Europe.
Read more about Jan Rovny here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
Amercian Amnesia: The Forgotten Roots of Social Prosperity
in the United StatesPaul Pierson, University of California at Berkeley
Discussant: Bruno Palier, Sciences Po, CEE/CNRSPaul Pierson is the John Gross Professor of Political Science at the University of California at Berkeley and a Senior Fellow at the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research. His research focuses on American and comparative political economy as well as social theory. Together with Jacob Hacker, he is the author of the highly influential book Winner-Take-All Politics: How Washington Made the Rich Richer and Turned Its Back on the Middle Class (Simon and Schuster 2010), whose impact goes much beyond the scientific realm. Other recent books include The Transformation of American Politics: Activist Government and the Rise of Conservatism (Princeton University Press 2007), co-edited with Theda Skocpol, and Off-Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy (Yale University Press 2005), co-authored by Jacob Hacker, and Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis (Princeton University Press 2004).
Read more about Paul Pierson here.
- Paper: After the “Master Theory”: Downs, Schattschneider, and the Rebirth of Policy-Focused Analysis
Bruno Palier is CNRS Researcher at Sciences Po. His research focuses on welfare reforms in Europe, a subject he investigates through various comparative projects: on social investment policies, on social dualisations, and on the politics – both national and European – of welfare reforms. He was a visiting scholar at Stockholm University, Northwestern University, Harvard University and the European University Institute in Florence and is Honorary Professor of Welfare State Research at Odense University, South Denmark. He also acted as scientific coordinator of an European Network of Excellence RECWOWE (Reconciling Work and Welfare).
Read more about Bruno Palier here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, May 26, 2014
Crisis, Valuation and Decommodification: How Bankers Reinvented Karl Polanyi in 2008Bruce G. Carruthers, Northwestern University
Discussant: Colin Hay, Sciences Po, CEEBruce G. Carruthers is the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Professor of Sociology at Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois. He is spending this academic year as a visiting fellow at the Wissenschaftskolleg zu Berlin and is the current president of SASE. He works in the areas of economic sociology and comparative-historical sociology, and has done research on a variety of topics including: corporate bankruptcy law, money and finance, modern derivatives markets, the history of credit ratings, accounting, the regulation of consumer credit, and the emergence of the early modern London stock market. His co-authored book, Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis (2009), won three book prizes from the American Sociological Association. He is currently writing a book on the history of credit in the US during the 19th and 20th centuries.
Read more about Bruce G. Carruthers here.
Colin Hay is Professor of Political Sciences in the Centre d'études européennes and Affiliate Professor of Political Analysis at the University of Sheffield, UK, where he was the founding co-director of the Sheffield Political Economy Research Institute). He was previously Professor of Political Analysis and Head of Department in POLSIS at the University of Birmingham, UK. He is a founding co-editor of the journals Comparative European Politics (with Ben Rosamond of Warwick University and Martin A. Schain of New York University) and British Politics (with Peter Kerr of the University of Birmingham, Dave Marsh of the Australian National University and Stephen Kettell of the University of Warwick) and is lead editor of New Political Economy.
Read more about Colin Hay here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with CEE
Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Time and Social PowerClaus Offe, Hertie School of Governance
Discussants: Jenny Andersson, Sciences Po, CEE / CNRS and Cornelia Woll, MaxPo and Sciences PoClaus Offe teaches Political Sociology at the Hertie School of Governance. He completed his PhD at the University of Frankfurt and his Habilitation at the University of Konstanz. In Germany, he has held chairs for Political Science and Political Sociology at the Universities of Bielefeld (1975-1989) and Bremen (1989-1995), as well as at the Humboldt-University of Berlin (1995-2005). He has worked as fellow and visiting professor at, among others, the Institutes for Advanced Study in Stanford, Princeton, and the Australian National University as well as Harvard University, the University of California at Berkeley and the New School University, New York.
Read more about Claus Offe here.
Jenny Andersson is CNRS fellow and researcher at the Centre d’études européennes at Sciences Po (CEE). She holds a PhD in Economic History from Uppsala University (2003). Before joining the CNRS and Sciences Po in October 2009, she was post-doctoral fellow and visiting scholar at the European University Institute, Florence, and at the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies, Harvard University. She was also a research fellow of the Swedish National Scientific Council and an associated professor with the Swedish Institute for Futures Studies in Stockholm from 2007-2009. Jenny has published several works on the transformations on social democracy in the post war period, Between Growth and Security: Swedish Social Democracy from a Strong Society to a Third Way, published in 2006 by Manchester University Press, and The Library and the Workshop: Social Democracy and Capitalism in an Age of Knowledge, Stanford University Press, 2009.
Read more about Jenny Andersson here.
Cornelia Woll is professor of political science at Sciences Po, where she co-directs MaxPo and LIEPP. Her research focuses on the international political economy and economic sociology, in particular regulatory issues, economic policy and finance in the European Union and the United States. A specialist on business-government relations, she is the author of Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on Global Trade (Cornell University Press, 2008) and has just published The Power of Inaction: Bank Bailouts in Comparison (Cornell University Press, 2014).
Read more about Cornelia Woll here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, March 3, 2014
A Sociology of Algorithms: High-Frequency Trading, Boundary Work, and Market ConfigurationsDonald MacKenzie, University of Edinburgh
Discussant: Marc Lenglet, European Business School ParisDonald MacKenzie is Professor of Sociology at the School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, and is known for his seminal contribution to the field of science and technology studies. His research deals first with the social construction of scientific knowledge and of technology (Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge, 1981; Inventing Accuracy: A Historical Sociology of Nuclear Missile Guidance, 1990; The Social Shaping of Technology, 1999). Since early 2000, Donald MacKenzie has become a major author in the field of social studies of finance, where he studied how theoretical finance shapes and transforms financial reality (An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets, 2006). His most recent work is devoted to the role of models in the financial crisis and to high frequency trading. Donald MacKenzie received numerous awards for his research, including the Chancellor's Award from HRH Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh and Chancellor of the University of Edinburgh, for his contributions to the field of Science and Technology Studies and the 1993 Robert K. Merton Award of the American Sociological Association. He has worked in the past on topics ranging from the sociology of nuclear weapons to the meaning of proof in the context of computer systems critical to safety or security.
Read more about Donald MacKenzie here.
Marc Lenglet is a Lecturer at the European Business School Paris (Management, Strategy and Systems Department). With interests in phenomenology and anthropology, his research focuses on the compliance function and the dissemination of norms within financial practices. Before joining the academia, he worked as an Equities Compliance Officer in a European brokerage house. He is now studding algorithmic trading and published several papers recently on this topic, including Conflicting codes and codings: how algorithmic trading is reshaping financial regulation in Theory, Culture and Society (2011).
Read more about Marc Lenglet here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Friday, January 10, 2014
Financialization and Changing US InequalitiesDonald Tomaskovic-Devey, University of Massachusetts
Discussant: Louis Chauvel, University of LuxembourgDonald Tomaskovic-Devey is Professor and past chair of sociology at the University of Massachusetts-Amherst. He is interested in the processes that generate workplace inequality. He has projects on the impact of financialization upon US income distribution, workplace desegregation and equal opportunity, network models of labor market structure, and relational inequality as a theoretical and empirical project. His long-term agenda is to work with others to move the social science of inequality to a more fully relational and organizational stance. He is advancing this agenda through studies of jobs and workplaces, as well as social relationships between jobs within workplaces and the social relationships that link organizations to each other. Recent publications from these projects have appeared in Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, Work and Occupations, the American Sociological Review, and the American Journal of Sociology. He has published three monographs: Recapitalizing America: Alternatives to the Corporate Distortion of National Policy (Routledge, 1983), Gender and Racial Inequality at Work: The Sources and Consequences of Job Segregation (Cornell, 1993), and Documenting Desegregation: Racial and Gender Segregation in Private Sector Employment Since the Civil Rights Act (Russell Sage Foundation, 2012).
Read more about Donald Tomaskovic-Devey here.
Louis Chauvel was appointed Professor of Sociology at the Université du Luxembourg in July 2012 as part of the PEARL programme. He was full professor at Sciences Po between 2005-2012 and an Honorary member of the Institut Universitaire de France (IUF 2003). His research topics are Social Inequalities and Public Policies, Social Change, Social Stratification and Mobility, Advanced Methodology of social sciences and population studies.
Read more about Louis Chauvel here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with CSO
Friday, November 29, 2013
The Fracturing of the American Corporate EliteMark S. Mizruchi, University of Michigan
Discussants: Pierre François and Claire Lemercier, Sciences Po, CSO/CNRSMark S. Mizruchi is the Barger Family Professor of Organizational Studies, Professor of Sociology, and Professor of Business Administration at the University of Michigan. His research focuses on the economic and political behavior of large American corporations as well as the methods of social network analysis. His primary current project is a study of the changing nature of the American corporate elite, from the period immediately after World War II to the present. He is also studying the globalization of American banking and a study of methods for measuring the effects of social network ties, the determinants of corporate lobbying activities, and the estimation bias in the network autocorrelation model (an approach for measuring the effects of social network ties). Besides his most recent publication, The Fracturing of the American Corporate Elite (Harvard University Press, 2013), he has published three books and more than 100 articles and reviews.
Read more about Mark S. Mizruchi here.
Claire Lemercier is a CNRS research professor in history at Sciences Po / CSO. A specialist of economic institutions and especially of the role of justice and arbitration in relationships between firms, she is also investigating the boards of the largest French firms from the 1840s to the 2000s (with Pierre François). This research aims at putting together insights from business history, economic sociology, and the history and sociology of economic elites.
Read more about Claire Lemercier here.
Pierre François is a CNRS research professor at Sciences Po / CSO and professor at the École Polytechnique. An economic sociologist who has extensively studied dynamics of art worlds, he is currently conducting research on contemporary poetry since the 1960s in collaboration with Sébastien Dubois. He is also working on a historical sociology of firms and their managing directors since the beginning of the 19th century (with Claire Lemercier).
Read more about Pierre François here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, October 14, 2013
Is There a Closure Penalty? Cohesive Network Structures, Diversity, and Gender Inequality in a Project-based Labor MarketMark Lutter, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne
Discussant: Emmanuel Lazega, Sciences Po, CSO/CNRSMark Lutter is a research fellow at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne. His research focuses on social structures in economic life. Currently, he is doing research on the emergence of extreme inequalities in markets, so-called winner-take all markets. He studied sociology, psychology, and statistics and was a doctoral student at the International Max Planck Research School on the Social and Political Constitution of the Economy. He received his Doctorate from University of Duisburg-Essen, and has held visiting fellowships at Harvard University and ETH Zurich.
Read more about Mark Lutter here.
Emmanuel Lazega is professor of sociology at Sciences Po and a member of the Centre de Sociologie des Organisations. He develops a neo-structural sociology, mainly applied to organizations and markets. His current research focuses on institutions of joint regulation of markets by business and the state.
Read more about Emmanuel Lazega here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Thursday, June 20, 2013
The Gendered Politics of Immigrant Integration Policy in Western EuropeKimberly J. Morgan, George Washington University
Discussant: Bruno Palier, CEEKimberley J. Morgan is an Associate Professor of Political Science and International Affairs at the George Washington University. Her research focuses on comparative public policy in advanced industrialized countries, with particular interests in family policies, immigration, health care, and taxation. She teaches undergraduate classes on European politics, comparative politics, immigration and identity, and graduate courses on comparative politics and comparative social policy. Her most recent book, The Delegated Welfare State: Medicare, Markets, and the Governance of American Social Policy, has been published by Oxford University Press.
Read more about Kimberly J. Morgan here.
Bruno Palier is CNRS Researcher at Sciences Po. His research focuses on welfare reforms in Europe, a subject he investigates through various comparative projects: on social investment policies, on social dualisations, and on the politics of welfare reforms – both national and European. He was a visiting scholar at Stockholm University, Northwestern University, Harvard University and the European University Institute in Florence and is Honorary Professor of Welfare State Research at Odense University, South Denmark. He currently serves as scientific coordinator of the European Network of Excellence RECWOWE (Reconciling Work and Welfare).
Read more about Bruno Palier here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with OSC
Monday, May 13, 2013
On the Run: Coming of Age under Mass ImprisonmentAlice Goffman, University of Wisconsin
Discussant: Nonna Mayer, CEEAlice Goffman is Assistant Professor, Department of Sociology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. She is an urban sociologist who grew up in Philadelphia. Her dissertation was an ethnographic account of the heavily policed ghetto that emerged as the US continues a War on Drugs and imprisons poor black men on a massive scale, and received the 2011 Best Dissertation Award from the American Sociological Association. With Mitchell Duneier, she recently completed a history and sociology of the ghetto from early modern Europe to the present.
Read more about Alice Goffman here.
Nonna Mayer is CNRS Research Director at the Centre for European Studies of Sciences Po (CEE). An expert in electoral sociology, she has published on the extreme right, racism, anti-Semitism and political participation. She is President of the French Political Science Association (AFSP) since 2005 and edits the series Contester (Protest), at the Presses de Sciences Po devoted to the transformations of the collective action repertoires.
Read more about Nonna Mayer here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, April 15, 2013
Austerity and the Domestic Foundations of Global ImbalancesPeter Alexis Gourevitch, University of California San Diego
Discussant: Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, Sciences Po and
University of California-BerkeleyPeter Alexis Gourevitch is Distinguished Professor at the Graduate School of International Relations and Pacific Studies at the University of California, San Diego, of which he is also the Founding Dean. As a world-renowned expert on international relations and comparative politics, Gourevitch specializes in corporate governance systems in a globalizing world economy, comparing differences in the way countries structure companies and their relationship to shareholders. He is an expert on international political economy with a particular focus on national responses to pressures arising from international trade and economic globalization, trade disputes among countries, and international trade negotiations. Recently he has been working on corporate social responsibility and the relationship between NGO's, regulation and international institutions.
Read more about Peter Alexis Gourevitch here.
Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas is Professor of economics at UC Berkeley. His main research interests are in international macroeconomics and finance. His recent research focuses on the importance of the valuation channel for the dynamics of external adjustment and the determination of exchange rates, on the determinants of capital flows to and from developing countries, on international portfolios, on global imbalances, on international price discrimination and on the global financial crisis. He was educated at Ecole Polytechnique and received his PhD from MIT and taught at Stanford Graduate School of Business and Princeton University.
Read more about Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with LIEPP/MPA
Monday, March 11, 2013
You Can't Make Me: Resistance to Corporate Diversity TrainingFrank Dobbin, Harvard University
Discussant: Laure Bereni, CNRSFrank Dobbin, Professor of Sociology at Harvard University, studies organizations, inequality, economic behavior, and public policy. His Inventing Equal Opportunity (Princeton, 2009) shows how corporate personnel managers defined what it meant to discriminate. Professor Dobbin's work in economic sociology generally is both historical and contemporary. His Forging Industrial Policy: United States, Britain, and France in the Railway Age (Cambridge, 1994), traces nations' modern industrial strategies to early differences in their political systems. The New Economic Sociology: A Reader (Princeton, 2004) assembles classics in economic sociology.
Read more about Frank Dobbin here.
Laure Bereni, Permanent Researcher in Sociology (CNRS), Centre Maurice Halbwachs, is interested in gender issues, social movements, and anti-discrimination policies. Her current research focuses on corporate diversity initiatives in an comparative perspective (France/USA) and on gender and high civil servants' carrers in France. She is the author of Introduction aux études sur le genre (with S. Chauvin, A. Jaunait and A. Revillard. De Boeck, 2012) and La parité (Economica, forthcoming 2012).
Read more about Laure Bereni here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
Monday, February 18, 2013
Future Matters: The Role of Imaginaries in Economic DecisionsJens Beckert, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies
Discussant: Richard Bronk, London School of EconomicsJens Beckert is professor of sociology and director of the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in Cologne. Currently he is a fellowat the Institut d’études avancées in Paris. He studied sociology and business administration at the Freie Universität Berlin and the New School for Social Research in New York, received his Ph.D. in sociology from the Freie Universität in 1996 and his Habilitation in 2003. Beckert was a visiting fellow at the sociology department of Princeton University in 1994/95 and at the Center for European Studies of Harvard University in 2001/02. In 2007 he was a Fernand Braudel Fellow at the European University Institute in Florence and in 2008 a guest researcher at the CSO in Paris.
His research focuses on the fields of economic sociology, organization theory and social theory. Recent publications: 2011: The Worth of Goods. Valuation and Pricing in the Economy (edited together with Patrik Aspers), Oxford University Press 2011, Inherited Wealth, Princeton University Press, 2008. Beyond the Market. The Social Foundations of Economic Efficiency, Princeton University Press 2002. International Encyclopedia of Economic Sociology (edited together with Milan Zafirovski), Routledge 2006.
Read more about Jens Beckert here.
Richard Bronk is a writer and Visiting Fellow at the European Institute of the London School of Economics and Political Science, where hetaught from 2000-2007. His academic expertise is in the history of ideas, philosophy of economics, comparative corporate governance and European political economy. He is author of Progress and the Invisible Hand - the Philosophy and Economics of Human Advance (Little Brown, 1998); and The Romantic Economist - Imagination in Economics (Cambridge University Press, 2009). Educated at Merton College, Oxford, with an MA (Oxon) in Classics and Philosophy, Richard spent seventeen years in the City of London – positions including head of European equities at Baring Asset Management, European equity strategist at Merrill Lynch, and Adviser on European capital markets and political economy at the Bank of England – before returning to academia in 2000. Richard’s current research interests centre on uncertainty; the role of imagination, language and metaphor in economics; the dangers of economic monoculture; and the epistemology of markets. His approach to philosophy of economics is grounded in a history of ideas perspective and in his practical experience in markets and economic policy. He is currently working on Hayek and the information provided by prices.
Read more about Richard Bronk here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with OSC
Monday, January 21, 2013
Unpolicing the Urban Poor: Consequences of Third Party Policing on Inner-City WomenMatt Desmond, Harvard University
Discussant: Sébastien Chauvin, University of AmsterdamMatthew Desmond is an Assistant Professor of Sociology and Social Studies at Harvard University. After receiving his Ph.D. in 2010 from the University of Wisconsin at Madison, he joined the Harvard Society of Fellows as a Junior Fellow. His primary teaching and research interests include urban sociology, race and ethnicity, poverty, social theory, organizations and work, and ethnography. Desmond is the author of On the Fireline: Living and Dying with Wildland Firefighters (2007), which won the Max Weber Award for Distinguished Scholarship by the American Sociological Association, as well as two books on race in America (both with Mustafa Emirbayer): Racial Domination, Racial Progress: The Sociology of Race in America (2009) and The Racial Order (forthcoming). He has written essays on educational inequality, dangerous work, political ideology, race and social theory, and the inner-city housing market. Desmond is the principal investigator of the Milwaukee Area Renters Study, an original survey of tenants in Milwaukee’s low-income private housing sector. His work has been supported by the MacArthur, Ford, and National Science Foundations, as well as by the American Philosophical Society; it also has been profiled in major news outlets such as The New York Times, National Public Radio, Science, and Das Erste. His current project combines ethnographic fieldwork, survey data, and documentary analysis to explore the causes, dynamics, and consequences of eviction among the urban poor and, more broadly, to plumb the inner workings of disadvantaged neighborhoods and the low-cost housing market.
Read more about Matthew Desmondhere.
Sébastien Chauvin is a tenured assistant professor of sociology at the University of Amsterdam. He has formerly taught at the Université Paris 1-Panthéon Sorbonne and as a visiting lecturer at the University of Chicago. His research deals with labor, migration, gender and sexuality issues, mainly in France and the United States. He has published Les Agences de la Précarité. Journaliers à Chicago (Seuil 2010) and is a contributor to the collective study exploring the labor-market experience and union-supported mobilization of undocumented immigrant workers in France (On bosse ici, on reste ici. La grève des sans-papiers: une aventure inédite [La Découverte 2011, with Pierre Barron, Anne Bory, Nicolas Jounin and Lucie Tourette]). More recent research projects focus on social capital and the sociology of global elites in Europe and the Caribbean (with Bruno Cousin), and on the critical history of the commodity form (with Olga Sezneva).
Read more about Sébastian Chauvin here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly organized with CSO
Monday, December 17, 2012
Creating the Market University: How Academic Science Became an Economic EngineElizabeth Popp-Berman, SUNY-Albany
Discussant: Christine Musselin, CSO/Sciences PoElizabeth Popp-Berman is an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Albany, SUNY, working at the intersection of economic sociology, organizations, the sociology of science and knowledge, and political sociology. She will present her first book, Creating the Market University (Princeton University Press), which has received the prestigious Social Science History Association’s President’s Book Award. In this work, Popp-Berman asks why US academic science, which historically set itself apart from the world of commerce, made such a dramatic move toward the market over the last several decades.
Read more about Elizabeth Popp-Berman here.
Christine Musselin is the director of the Centre de Sociologie des Organisations. She specializes in comparative studies of higher education systems, focusing on university governance, public policies on higher education and research, state-universities relationships and academic labour markets. She is the author of La longue marche des universités françaises, PUF, 2001 (English translation by Routledge in 2004) and The Market for Academics Routledge, 2010.
Read more about Christine Musselin here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly with CERI
Monday, November 19, 2012
Race, Self-Selection, and the Job Search ProcessDevah Pager, Princeton University
Discussant: Olivier Godechot, CNRSDevah Pager is Professor of Sociology and Co-director of the Joint Degree Program in Social Policy at Princeton University. She is also Faculty Associate of the Office of Population Research and the Woodrow Wilson School. Her research focuses on institutions affecting racial stratification, including education, labor markets, and the criminal justice system. Pager's recent research has involved a series of field experiments studying discrimination against minorities and ex-offenders in the low-wage labor market. Her book, Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration (University of Chicago, 2007), investigates the racial and economic consequences of large-scale imprisonment for contemporary U.S. labor markets.
Read more about Devah Pager here.
Olivier Godechot is a research scholar at the Centre Maurice Halbwachs and at the Quantitative Sociology Laboratory. He works on remuneration in the financial industry and on networks and recruitment in the academic world. He is the author of Working Rich: Salaires, Bonus et appropriation du Profit dans l’Industrie Financière (La Découverte 2007) et Les Traders: Essai de Sociologie Financière (La Découverte 2001).
Read more about Olivier Godechot here.
opener
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar, jointly with LIEPP/MPA
Monday, October 15, 2012
The Politics of Collective Inaction: Bailouts in Comparative PerspectiveCornelia Woll, Sciences Po
Discussant: Philippe Martin, Departement of Economics, Sciences PoCornelia Woll is director at MaxPo and LIEPP. A political scientists, she studies economic policy-making in industrialized countries, most notably financial regulation and trade. She is the author of Firm Interests: How Governments Shape Business Lobbying on global trade (Cornell University Press, 2008) and has published widely on lobbying in Europe and the United States on international trade, the liberalization of service sectors and network industries, the transformation of business-government relations, the Europeanization of economic policy domains and French business representation.
Read more about Cornelia Woll here.
Philippe Martin is currently chairman of the Economics Department at Sciences-Po Paris. His research focuses on international economics (trade and international macroeconomics) and economic geography.
Read more about Philippe Martin here.
opener
-
For more information, please contact
Allison Rovny
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
- © maxpo 2012
- Imprint
- Contact
- Privacy Policy
Back to top© maxpo 2012
maxpo was jointly established by the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, and Sciences Po, Paris
http://www.maxpo.eu -
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with OSC
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
-
MaxPo SCOOPS Seminar
-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CEE
-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CHSP and CERI
-
MaxPo SCOOPS − CEE general seminar
-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CEE
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with OSC and PRESAGE
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CSO and CEE
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
MaxPo SCOOPS − co-sponsored with École urbaine de Sciences Po and
Cities are back in town
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
Joint seminar with CEE
-
MaxPo seminar
-
MaxPo SCOOPS − joint seminar with CSO
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
Joint seminar with CSO
-
MaxPo SCOOPS
-
Joint seminar with CEE
-
MaxPo seminar with Sciences Po Law School